From the book
Alcibiades I
Plato · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordἈμαθία is lack of learning or understanding and can carry the reproach of stupidity.
- In Alcibiades IAt 118a Socrates names the state just isolated by the argument.
- In this editionThe edition retains Burnet's καί at 118a4: this ignorance causes bad things “and is” the disgraceful stupidity.
- A place to readThe mistaken self-assessment is isolated and named reproachable amathia.
Meaning
Ἀμαθία is lack of learning or understanding and can carry the reproach of stupidity. The dialogue's phrase ἡ ἐπονείδιστος ἀμαθία means the ignorance open to reproach, rendered “the disgraceful stupidity.” It is not a medical diagnosis or an assertion of permanently limited intellectual capacity. In context the reproach falls on not knowing while thinking one knows, especially about the matters on which a would-be ruler intends to act.
Use in the book
At 118a Socrates names the state just isolated by the argument. This ignorance causes bad things and is the disgraceful amathia. He then asks when it is most harmful and shameful: when it concerns the greatest objects. Justice, the fine, the good, and advantage are supplied as those objects. The seriousness of the judgment depends both on false confidence and on the practical importance of the field.
At 118b the diagnosis becomes personal. Socrates says Alcibiades is living with the most extreme amathia, as the argument and Alcibiades himself accuse him. The language of “living with” gives the ignorance an intimate, persistent presence. It explains his rush into politics before education. Socrates nevertheless extends the condition to most current politicians and includes a qualification for a few possible exceptions. The passage targets a civic pattern as well as an individual.
The dialogue subsequently treats the condition as remediable. Alcibiades must not use the ignorance of others as an excuse for neglect; he must undertake care. At 127d–e recognition of his shameful state is met with encouragement because he is at an age suitable for correction. Calling the earlier condition stupidity should not obscure that educational possibility or invite contempt for someone simply because he lacks schooling.
The word's force is sharper than ordinary “not knowing,” but the sharpness arises through the diagnosis already established. A lexicon should not make every occurrence of ignorance equivalent to amathia or treat the label as proof independent of the argument.
Places to read
Translation in this edition
The edition retains Burnet's καί at 118a4: this ignorance causes bad things “and is” the disgraceful stupidity. Removing the conjunction would silently follow a conjecture reported but not printed. At 118b6 Burnet prints “most extreme” from B and Olympiodorus; T has “most shameful.”
ἀμαθία
Attested: ἡ ἐπονείδιστος ἀμαθία (hē eponeidistos amathia; 118a). At 118a: Reproachable lack of understanding, named after the ignorance that thinks it knows has been isolated. Lexical identification: lemma: ἀμαθία. See Disgraceful ignorance.
ἐπονείδιστος
Attested: ἐπονείδιστος (eponeidistos; 118a). Reproachable or disgraceful; it qualifies the unlearnedness that wrongly takes itself to be knowledge. Lexical identification: lemma: ἐπονείδιστος. See Disgraceful ignorance.
ἔσχατος
Attested: τῇ ἐσχάτῃ (tēi eschatēi; 118b). At 118b: Of the most extreme kind, qualifying the amathia with which Alcibiades is said to live. Lexical identification: lemma: ἔσχατος. See Disgraceful ignorance.
πάθος
Attested: πάθος (pathos; 118b). At 118b: The troubling condition diagnosed as extreme amathia, something Alcibiades has undergone and now must recognize. Lexical identification: lemma: πάθος. See Disgraceful ignorance.
Source note
The supplied edition’s note 29 compares the reproachable ignorance with Apology 29b. The present article rests on Alcibiades I 117d–118b23 and does not require treating the two passages as an identical theory of every kind of error.