Historical technical vocabulary

Vital and animal spirits

esprits vitaux; esprits animaux

These phrases name historical physiological agents.

From the book

The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volumes I–II

Joseph Joubert · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordThese phrases name historical physiological agents.
  • In JoubertJoubert’s first-person contrast gives him more vital than animal spirits and says those going to his head are no longer in his stomach.
  • In this editionThe translation note identifies these as period physiological terms and distinguishes their arterial and nervous associations.
  • A place to beginThe two kinds of spirits are distinguished within a head/stomach distribution.
English renderings
vital spirits; animal spirits

Meaning

These phrases name historical physiological agents. They are not interchangeable with the soul, with intelligence, or with someone’s cheerful “spirits.”

Use in the book

Joubert’s first-person contrast gives him more vital than animal spirits and says those going to his head are no longer in his stomach. The terms organize an account of distribution within the body. In the later quotation about imagination’s vertigos, animal spirits and brain fibers explain intellectual effects; Joubert immediately asks whether the soul alone can have no part. The objection is to explaining everything through matter alone, and remains compatible with his use of bodily vocabulary elsewhere.

Places to read

  1. I, p. 379, entry 5, ¶1The two kinds of spirits are distinguished within a head/stomach distribution.
  2. I, p. 447–448, entry 7, ¶1A quoted physiological explanation prompts an objection to exclusive material explanation.

Translation in this edition

The translation note identifies these as period physiological terms and distinguishes their arterial and nervous associations. The explanation follows the translation note. Vertiges remains “vertigos,” not the conjecturally smoother “traces”; the quoted sentence’s source wording and Joubert’s response stay distinct.

Source note

Beaunier 1938, I, pp. 379, 447, 448.