Body and life

Stomach

estomac; estomach

The stomach is both an organ felt as a bodily demand and a model of transforming what is received.

From the book

The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volumes I–II

Joseph Joubert · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordThe stomach is both an organ felt as a bodily demand and a model of transforming what is received.
  • In JoubertThe muscular account compares its action to a wringing hand and distinguishes effective processing from restoration of strength.
  • In this editionThe English translation renders the recurring spelling estomach as stomach.
  • A place to beginThe stomach is imagined as a hand that presses and wrings.
English renderings
stomach

Meaning

The stomach is both an organ felt as a bodily demand and a model of transforming what is received. Its contrast with the head does not simply contrast body with a disembodied mind.

Use in the book

The muscular account compares its action to a wringing hand and distinguishes effective processing from restoration of strength. The observation that spirits occupying the head are no longer in the stomach treats the two as competitors within a historical physiological picture. Much later, an unnamed physician’s capricious little animal supplies an image that Joubert extends: stomach and brain digest different materials. The comparison gives the brain a bodily operation rather than treating digestion as the exclusive property of food.

Places to read

  1. I, p. 123, entry 4, ¶1The stomach is imagined as a hand that presses and wrings.
  2. I, p. 379, entry 5, ¶1The head and stomach receive unequal shares of spirits.
  3. II, p. 862, entry 7, ¶1A quoted physician’s image leads to parallel stomach and brain digestion.

Translation in this edition

The English translation renders the recurring spelling estomach as stomach. The Montpellier physician remains unidentified, and the final brain clause inherits “digests” from the stomach clause. These are source descriptions and comparisons, not a unified modern account of the gut and brain.

Source note

Beaunier 1938, I, pp. 123, 379; II, pp. 862.