Diotimos Library · Literary Fiction Collection · Bilingual Edition
The Gods Are Athirst
Les Dieux ont soif · Complete French–English bilingual edition
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Facing Pages · Branch 57 of 120
Chapter XI · Paragraphs 35–48
Edition pages
Printed pages in the supplied Diotimos 2026 bilingual edition.
- French
- Diotimos 2026 pp. 232, 234, 236, 238
- English
- Diotimos 2026 pp. 233, 235, 237, 239
French
Enfin l’accusé parut, escorté de grenadiers, libre toutefois de ses membres comme le prescrivait la loi. C’était un homme d’une cinquantaine d’années, maigre, sec, brun, très chauve, les joues creuses, les lèvres minces et violacées, vêtu à l’ancienne mode d’un habit sang de bœuf. Sans doute parce qu’il avait la fièvre, ses yeux brillaient comme des pierreries et ses joues avaient l’air d’être vernies. Il s’assit. Ses jambes, qu’il croisait, étaient d’une maigreur excessive et ses grandes mains noueuses en faisaient tout le tour. Il se nommait Marie-Adolphe Guillergues et était prévenu de dilapidation dans les fourrages de la République. L’acte d’accusation mettait à sa charge des faits nombreux et graves, dont aucun n’était absolument certain. Interrogé, Guillergues nia la plupart de ces faits et expliqua les autres à son avantage. Son langage était précis et froid, singulièrement habile et donnait l’idée d’un homme avec lequel il n’est pas désirable de traiter une affaire. Il avait réponse à tout. Quand le juge lui faisait une question embarrassante, son visage restait calme et sa parole assurée, mais ses deux mains, réunies sur sa poitrine, se crispaient d’angoisse. Gamelin s’en aperçut et dit à l’oreille de son voisin, peintre comme lui:
"Regardez ses pouces!"
Le premier témoin qu’on entendit apporta des faits accablants. C’est sur lui que reposait toute l’accusation. Ceux qui furent appelés ensuite se montrèrent, au contraire, favorables à l’accusé. Le substitut de l’accusateur public fut véhément, mais demeura dans le vague. Le défenseur parla avec un ton de vérité qui valut à l’accusé des sympathies qu’il n’avait pas su lui-même se concilier. L’audience fut suspendue et les jurés se réunirent dans la chambre des délibérations. Là, après une discussion obscure et confuse, ils se partageaient en deux groupes à peu près égaux en nombre. On vit d’un côté les indifférents, les tièdes, les raisonneurs, qu’aucune passion n’animait, et d’un autre côté ceux qui se laissaient conduire par le sentiment, se montraient peu accessibles à l’argumentation et jugeaient avec le cœur. Ceux-là condamnaient toujours. C’étaient les bons, les purs: ils ne songeaient qu’à sauver la République et ne s’embarrassaient point du reste. Leur attitude fit une forte impression sur Gamelin qui se sentait en communion avec eux.
"Ce Guillergues, songeait-il, est un adroit fripon, un scélérat qui a spéculé sur le fourrage de notre cavalerie. L’absoudre, c’est laisser échapper un traître, c’est trahir la patrie, vouer l’armée à la défaite." Et Gamelin voyait déjà les hussards de la République, sur leurs montures qui bronchaient, sabrés par la cavalerie ennemie.... "Mais si Guillergues était innocent?..."
Il pensa tout à coup à Jean Blaise, soupçonné aussi d’infidélité dans les fournitures. Tant d’autres devaient agir comme Guillergues et Blaise, préparer la défaite, perdre la République! Il fallait faire un exemple. Mais si Guillergues était innocent?...
"Il n’y a pas de preuves, dit Gamelin, à haute voix.
— Il n’y a jamais de preuves", répondit en haussant les épaules le chef du jury, un bon, un pur.
Finalement, il se trouva sept voix pour la condamnation et huit pour l’acquittement.
Le jury rentra dans la salle et l’audience fut reprise. Les jurés étaient tenus de motiver leur verdict; chacun parla à son tour devant le fauteuil vide. Les uns étaient prolixes; les autres se contentaient d’un mot; il y en avait qui prononçaient des paroles inintelligibles.
Quand vint son tour, Gamelin se leva et dit:
"En présence d’un crime si grand que d’ôter aux défenseurs de la patrie les moyens de vaincre, on veut des preuves formelles que nous n’avons point."
A la majorité des voix, l’accusé fut déclaré non coupable.
Guillergues fut ramené devant les juges, accompagné du murmure bienveillant des spectateurs qui lui annonçaient son acquittement. C’était un autre homme. La sécheresse de ses traits s’était fondue, ses lèvres s’étaient amollies. Il avait l’air vénérable; son visage exprimait l’innocence. Le président lut, d’une voix émue, le verdict qui renvoyait le prévenu; la salle éclata en applaudissements. Le gendarme qui avait amené Guillergues se précipita dans ses bras. Le président l’appela et lui donna l’accolade fraternelle. Les jurés l’embrassèrent. Gamelin pleurait à chaudes larmes.
Dans la cour du Palais, illuminée des derniers rayons du jour, une multitude hurlante s’agitait. Les quatre sections du Tribunal avaient prononcé la veille trente condamnations à mort, et, sur les marches du grand escalier, des tricoteuses accroupies attendaient le départ des charrettes. Mais Gamelin, descendant les degrés dans le flot des jurés et des spectateurs, ne voyait rien, n’entendait rien que son acte de justice et d’humanité et les félicitations qu’il se donnait d’avoir reconnu l’innocence. Dans la cour, Élodie, toute blanche, en larmes et souriante, se jeta dans ses bras et y resta pâmée. Et, quand elle eut recouvré la voix, elle lui dit:
English
At last the accused appeared, escorted by grenadiers but with his limbs unbound, as the law prescribed. He was a man of about fifty, thin, spare and dark, very bald, with hollow cheeks and thin, purplish lips, dressed in an old-fashioned oxblood coat. Probably because he had a fever, his eyes shone like jewels and his cheeks looked varnished. He sat down. His crossed legs were so excessively thin that his large, knotted hands encircled them completely. His name was Marie-Adolphe Guillergues, and he was charged with misappropriating the Republic’s fodder supplies. The indictment accused him of numerous serious acts, none of them absolutely established. Questioned, Guillergues denied most of them and explained the rest to his own advantage. His language was precise, cold and remarkably skilful, suggesting a man with whom one would not wish to do business. He had an answer to everything. When the judge put an awkward question, his face remained calm and his speech confident, but his hands, clasped upon his chest, clenched in anguish. Gamelin noticed and whispered to his neighbour, a painter like himself:
“Look at his thumbs!”
The first witness to be heard gave damning evidence. The entire accusation rested on him. Those called afterwards, on the contrary, spoke in the accused’s favour. The deputy public prosecutor was vehement but remained vague. The defence counsel spoke with a ring of truth that won the accused sympathies he had not known how to win for himself. The hearing was suspended and the jurors withdrew to the deliberation room. There, after an obscure and confused discussion, they divided into two groups of almost equal size. On one side were the indifferent, the lukewarm, the reasoners, moved by no passion; on the other those who let feeling guide them, were little open to argument and judged with their hearts. These always convicted. They were the good, the pure: they thought only of saving the Republic and did not trouble themselves about the rest. Their attitude made a powerful impression on Gamelin, who felt in communion with them.
“This Guillergues,” he thought, “is a cunning rogue, a villain who has speculated in our cavalry’s fodder. To acquit him is to let a traitor escape, betray the country and condemn the army to defeat.” Already Gamelin saw the Republic’s hussars on stumbling mounts, cut down by the enemy cavalry… “But what if Guillergues were innocent?…”
He suddenly thought of Jean Blaise, also suspected of dishonesty in supplies. So many others must be acting like Guillergues and Blaise, preparing defeat, ruining the Republic! An example must be made. But what if Guillergues were innocent?…
“There is no proof,” Gamelin said aloud.
“There never is any proof,” the foreman replied with a shrug—a good man, one of the pure.
In the end there were seven votes for conviction and eight for acquittal.
The jury returned to the chamber and the hearing resumed. The jurors were required to give reasons for their verdict; each spoke in turn before the empty armchair. Some were long-winded; others contented themselves with a word; some spoke unintelligibly.
When his turn came, Gamelin rose and said:
“Faced with so great a crime as depriving the defenders of the country of the means to win, we require definite proof, and we do not have it.”
By a majority of votes, the accused was declared not guilty.
Guillergues was brought back before the judges, accompanied by the spectators’ kindly murmur telling him of his acquittal. He was another man. The hardness of his features had melted, his lips had softened. He looked venerable; his face expressed innocence. In a moved voice the president read the verdict discharging him, and the chamber burst into applause. The gendarme who had brought Guillergues rushed into his arms. The president called him forward and gave him the fraternal embrace. The jurors kissed him. Gamelin wept freely.
A howling multitude stirred in the courtyard of the Palais, lit by the day’s last rays. The Tribunal’s four divisions had passed thirty death sentences the day before, and on the steps of the great staircase, crouching women knitters waited for the carts to leave. But Gamelin, descending amid the stream of jurors and spectators, saw and heard nothing but his own act of justice and humanity and his own congratulations on having recognised innocence. In the courtyard Élodie, all in white, tearful and smiling, threw herself into his arms and lay there in a swoon. When she recovered her voice, she said:
Socrates
Reading The Gods Are Athirst · Chapter XI · Chapter XI · Paragraphs 35–48
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Anatole France’s The Gods Are Athirst follows the painter Évariste Gamelin as revolutionary conviction draws him into the work of the Revolutionary Tribunal. This complete French–English edition preserves the novel’s twenty-nine chapters, paired by source paragraph, with an introduction, historical orientation, glossary, and chapter notes.
Historical Text and Translation
The novel appeared in volume in 1912. The complete French reading text follows Project Gutenberg eBook 36477, whose underlying impression is undated and carries a later Brodard & Taupin colophon. Chapter I was also checked against a separate 1912 printing; that limited collation is distinguished from the source used for the whole novel.
About Diotimos Editions
The new English translation and editorial matter were generated and revised with AI for Diotimos Editions. The reader preserves the supplied paragraph pairing, songs, quoted letters, and 431 chapter notes, together with the source register and the edition’s statement of editorial responsibility.
Rights
Anatole France’s French source work is in the public domain. The new 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are credited as supplied in this bilingual edition.