DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II

Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IIBook V · Chapter 14 · §§ 1–2

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Facing Pages · Branch 50 of 191

Book V · Chapter 14 · §§ 1–2

Latin

p. 94

Quartadecima ratio: quia est per se vita.

Anima est essentia; est et vita. Superioribus rationibus ostendimus eam esse immortalem quia sit essentia per se existens; in praesentia vero eiusdem immortalitatem ostendimus quia sit vita per se vivens. Porro anima ex ipsa sui essentia vita est, quia totum quod est in ea est vita. Si quid enim esset in ea quod vita non esset, illud quidem non pars esset animae, et totum ipsum animatum quiddam potius quam anima diceretur. Fateamur igitur totam animae essentiam esse vitam. Si tota est vita, per se certe secundum formam vita dicenda est. Nam quod per aliud vivit, ipsum per se non vivens, ex duabus componitur partibus: ex natura, inquam, sui propria secundum se non viva, atque ex vita illa aliunde accepta. Ita conclude: si res illa quae per aliud vivit non tota vita est, sequitur ut res quae tota est vita per se vivat. Ergo anima, quae tota est vita, per se vivit, praesertim cum per se moveatur. Si ita est, per se est vita. Est igitur animae essentia vita. Cuius rei signum est quod cuicumque advenit praestat vitam, quasi per se sit hoc ipsum quod tribuit alteri. Unde, abeunte illa, desinit corpus vivere; ac, dum adest corpori, nullum momentum cessat vitae opera exercere corpus vivificando. Quare perennis animae actus vivificatio est. Perennis actio propria est rei actio. Propria igitur est animae actio vivificare. Vivificare autem vitae ipsius est proprium, sicut caloris est calefacere. Igitur essentia animae vita est.

Accipe rursus aliam coniecturam, quod parato corpore anima statim illud vivificat. Aut ergo suo esse dat vitam, aut appetitu, aut cognitione sive consilio. Si anima cognitione et consilio corpus vivificaret, scirent omnes quid quolibet momento gignat et alat in visceribus anima, qualisque sit interni operis dispositio; et nisi cognoscerent, ista non fierent. Sed numquid appetitu? Neque hoc quidem. Alioquin quamdiu vellet animus esse in corpore, tamdiu esset; et qui odit corporis consuetudinem a corpore confestim discederet. Restat ut ipso esse, id est naturali virtute, vivificet corpus. Si ipso esse vivificat, per suam essentiam est vita aut vivens, sicut quod ipso esse calefacit per essentiam suam virtutemve est calor aut calens. Conclude animae essentiam esse quandam vitam.

94

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book V

p. 95

Fourteenth argument: because it is life in itself.

The soul is an essence, and it is also life. By the preceding arguments we showed it to be immortal because it is an essence existing in its own right; now we show the same immortality because it is a life living in its own right. The soul is life by its very essence, because everything in it is life. If anything in it were not life, that thing would not be a part of the soul, and the whole would be called an animated thing rather than a soul. Let us therefore acknowledge that the soul’s entire essence is life. If it is wholly life, it must in its formal nature be called life in its own right. Whatever lives through another and is not itself alive in its own right is composed of two parts: a proper nature not alive in itself, and life received from elsewhere. Conclude, then: if a thing that lives through another is not wholly life, a thing that is wholly life must live through itself. The soul, being wholly life, lives through itself—especially since it moves itself. If so, it is life in its own right. The soul’s essence is therefore life. A sign of this is that, wherever it arrives, it bestows life, as though it were in itself the very thing it gives to another. When it departs, the body ceases to live; while it is present to the body, it never for one instant ceases to perform the works of life by giving the body life. Vivification is therefore the soul’s perpetual activity. A perpetual activity is a thing’s proper activity; the soul’s proper activity is thus to give life. And giving life belongs properly to life itself, just as heating belongs to heat. The soul’s essence, therefore, is life.

Consider another indication. As soon as a body is prepared, the soul gives it life. It must do so either by its being, by desire, or by cognition and deliberation. If the soul vivified the body through cognition and deliberation, everyone would know what the soul generates and nourishes in the organs at every moment and how its internal work is arranged; unless they knew these things, those processes would not occur. Does the soul act by desire? Not that either. Otherwise the mind would remain in the body as long as it wished, and anyone who hated association with the body would leave it at once. It remains that the soul vivifies the body by its very being—that is, by its natural power. If it gives life by its very being, then through its essence it is either life or a living thing, just as whatever heats by its very being is through its essence or power either heat or something hot. Conclude that the soul’s essence is a kind of life.

95

About This Reading Edition

Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.