Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Introduction · Branch 4 of 191
Contents continued
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Contents continued
p. 4Volume II contents continued
Book VII · 231
VII.1 First argument. A body does not receive images suited to sensation. · 232
VII.2 Second argument. The five senses must be brought together at a single center. · 238
VII.3 Third argument. The more confined the sense, the keener it is. · 242
VII.4 Fourth argument. If the faculty of sensation is divisible, the sensible image within it will be divided. · 244
VII.5 Fifth argument. The soul as a whole senses everywhere. · 248
VII.6 Sixth argument. The soul is not necessarily acted upon in sensing. · 256
VII.7 Seventh argument. Arguments drawn specifically from the soul's natural and sensitive power show that the soul is not a divisible form, since a quality has a single operation. · 262
VII.8 Eighth argument. A bodily constitution acts through the power of its qualities. · 264
VII.9 Ninth argument. A bodily constitution is an accidental form. · 266
VII.10 Tenth argument. The harmony of a bodily constitution produces no effect upon the body. · 270
VII.11 Eleventh argument. There is harmony in every composite body. · 272
VII.12 Twelfth argument. Harmony is understood either as the composition of the parts itself or as some proportion within that composition. · 274
VII.13 Thirteenth argument. A harmony of the humors receives nothing apart from matter. · 276
VII.14 Fourteenth argument. The greater a thing's concord, the more fully it is a harmony. · 278
VII.15 Fifteenth argument. Harmony admits nothing discordant. · 280
Book VIII · 283
VIII.1 The soul ascends through four stages to spirit. First argument. · 284
VIII.2 The soul is nourished by truth. Second argument. · 294
VIII.3 Third argument. Because the soul's virtue is indivisible, it cannot be a quality of a body. · 306
VIII.4 Fourth argument. Neither an intelligible form nor an intelligible conception can be received by a body. · 316
VIII.5 Fifth argument. If the mind is a body, it understands by touching things and by traversing them. · 338
VIII.6 Sixth argument. Whatever the intellect receives, it receives with its whole self; it would not do so if it were bodily. · 342
VIII.7 Seventh argument. In receiving the forms of things, the intellect does not lose its own form; bodies do. · 344
VIII.8 Eighth argument. A form in the mind is universal; such a form cannot exist in a body. · 346
VIII.9 Ninth argument. Minds embrace one another; bodies do no such thing. · 348
VIII.10 Tenth argument. The mind acts through all bodies and beyond them. · 350
VIII.11 Eleventh argument. The mind advances through stillness, the body through motion. · 354
VIII.12 Twelfth argument. Things contrary in matter are not contrary in the mind. · 356
VIII.13 Thirteenth argument. The mind is not changed when it receives forms. · 358
VIII.14 Fourteenth argument. A body's activity tends toward a composite thing; the mind's activity, toward simple things. · 362
VIII.15 Fifteenth argument. The mind's action has its end in action; a body's action, in a body. · 364
VIII.16 Sixteenth argument. A bodily form does not possess infinite power; the mind does. · 370
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Contents continued · Contents continued
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive