From the book
Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum
Heinrich Khunrath · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordThe wax nose is an image of wording that can be bent to serve the interpreter.
- In KhunrathOn page 111 the Philosophers' sayings about Chaos or universal Magnesia can, to all appearance, be turned toward every matter in the world.
- In this editionThe primary German has a literal wax nose; nasus cereus is a useful lookup term, not wording actually printed in this passage.
- A reading distinctionPage 111 first says that one must attend to what is said rather than who says it.
Meaning
The wax nose is an image of wording that can be bent to serve the interpreter. Khunrath begins with a saying about written law, then applies it to alchemical writings and, in the margin, to wrongly understood Scripture. Its immediate subject is the danger of apparent verbal proof.
Use in the book
On page 111 the Philosophers' sayings about Chaos or universal Magnesia can, to all appearance, be turned toward every matter in the world. The reason is not simply that old authors write badly. Khunrath argues that all things can be predicated of the universal matter because all material things originate from it; hence its philosophical name Omnia, all things. A universal vocabulary is peculiarly open to opportunistic selection. Someone searching for confirmation of a favoured material can seize an applicable predicate while ignoring the remainder.
That danger explains the stricter instruction of page 40: all the relevant properties must agree, without being dragged in by the hair. It also explains the move on page 112 from the bare letter of books to Nature's possibility as the safer basis for reasoning. The wax-nose passage is thus more than a joke at scholarly ingenuity. It identifies a weakness in the evidence that Khunrath himself frequently uses and proposes a control upon it.
The marginal extension to Scripture is carefully framed. It says that a Bible not rightly understood or interpreted can become matter for heresies. The claim concerns misuse, not a repudiation of biblical authority. Likewise the body does not dismiss the Philosophers' writings, which page 110 has just allowed to stand in a Nature-conforming understanding. The interpreter's freedom is constrained by the natural object, the intended kind of work, and agreement across the description. Bendable wording becomes dangerous when those constraints are forgotten.
Places to read
- 1599 p. 40The earlier demand for unforced agreement of all properties answers the same danger of selective interpretation.
- 1599 p. 110The preceding paragraph retains the books' authority within a Nature-conforming sense.
- 1599 p. 111The wax nose moves from written law to alchemical writings, with Omnia explaining the range of possible predicates.
- 1599 p. 111 · marginWrongly understood Scripture is said to become material for heresies, extending the concern to interpretation rather than rejecting Scripture.
- 1599 p. 112Nature's possibility and touchstone are offered as the safer standard.
Translation in this edition
The primary German has a literal wax nose; nasus cereus is a useful lookup term, not wording actually printed in this passage. The supplied modern note traces an earlier history for the figure. This companion does not use that apparatus-only genealogy as proof of a particular book or author that Khunrath consulted.
Source note
Page 111 first says that one must attend to what is said rather than who says it. The wax-nose image immediately complicates that advice: attending to words still requires a disciplined account of their meaning.