Inner life and desire

The Vague of the Passions

vague; vague des passions

As an adjective vague means undefined or indistinct; as a substantive, le vague names the unbounded, unassigned condition of faculties not yet fixed upon an object.

From the book

René

François-René de Chateaubriand · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordAs an adjective vague means undefined or indistinct; as a substantive, le vague names the unbounded, unassigned condition of faculties not yet fixed upon an object.
  • In RenéThe extract from the Génie opposes rich imagination to impoverished existence and a full heart to an empty world (Preface p. 9).
  • In this editionThe supplied English retains the French substantive, usually italicized, because ‘vagueness’ loses its charged intensity.
  • A place to readsans but et sans objet — The programmatic definition concerns direction and employment, not low emotional intensity.

Meaning

As an adjective vague means undefined or indistinct; as a substantive, le vague names the unbounded, unassigned condition of faculties not yet fixed upon an object. The Preface’s formulation is precise about this indeterminacy: the powers are young, active, and intact, but enclosed and exercised only upon themselves. Vagueness here is compatible with force, abundance, and acute suffering.

The term is a conceptual frame rather than a word René endlessly repeats. In the 1826 story its surviving adjectival occurrence belongs to the valleys around religious refuges, where the heart feels the ‘vague feeling of misfortune’ (p. 147). The title-like expression is concentrated in the authorial apparatus and earlier readings.

Use in the book

The extract from the Génie opposes rich imagination to impoverished existence and a full heart to an empty world (Preface p. 9). Books and examples have made people experienced in advance: disillusion comes before enjoyment. This is not a simple account of innocence awaiting experience, since reflection already anticipates and consumes possible experience. The state precedes developed passions but has its own complicated cultural formation.

The 1802 paragraphs preserved in Appendix I no. 1 make Christianity especially important. Earthly grief and heavenly hope produce inexhaustible reverie, while monastic melancholy and indeterminate passion regenerate one another. The Preface omits those paragraphs and follows the shortened extract with a Defence that condemns solitary reverie under the names of Rousseau and Werther. The contrast is consequential, but punishment was already in the 1802 ending of the chapter (Appendix I no. 2). One should not manufacture a wholly innocent early version followed by a wholly punitive later one.

Within the narrative, the country episode realizes the condition without relying on its label. The beloved has no existing identity; sensations are innumerable and difficult to paint; the heart’s power alternates between fullness and void. Amélie’s revelation then gives feeling a definite misfortune, which René’s passions seize with disturbing satisfaction. Determination ends one form of vagueness without necessarily ending the self-consuming pattern. Souël finally repeats the underlying mechanism: isolation intensifies faculties while withholding employment for them.

Places to read

  1. Preface p. 9sans but et sans objet — The programmatic definition concerns direction and employment, not low emotional intensity.
  2. p. 147le vague sentiment de l'infortune — The adjective survives in the description of monastic landscapes and the hope of shelter.
  3. p. 161, 1802 variant edans le vague d'un cœur solitaire — The 1802 wording names the theoretical state where 1826 instead names a void.
  4. Appendix I no. 1une source de maux présens et d'espérances lointaines — The omitted account makes Christian temporal orientation productive of modern reverie.

Translation in this edition

The supplied English retains the French substantive, usually italicized, because ‘vagueness’ loses its charged intensity. The 1802 variants at pp. 156 and 1592 include vague; p. 161 substitutes vide in 1826. These are comparisons reported by the supplied edition, not results of an independent collation, and cannot all be assigned to 1805.