From the book
Sal Lumen and Spiritus Mundi Philosophici
Clovis Hesteau de Nuysement · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Meaning
II.3.4 introduces an objection as common opinion: cabbage juice loosens the bowels, while the marc, its pressed residue, binds them. The author’s answer is stricter than saying two nutritive portions act differently. If loosening belongs to the plant’s substance, he says binding cannot come from that same substance; the marc is excluded from it, rejected by the stomach as excrementitious and without nutritive power.
The nutritive virtue belongs to the substance and each part of it. More and less apply to actions and powers, not to essence. The surrounding hellebore example also distinguishes recipients and times: a plant can be beneficial to one body and fatal to another, but not nourish and kill the same recipient together. These are historical claims, not dietary or medical guidance; the printed effect in the wider argument is not silently changed to cause.
Places to read
- Book Two · Chapter 3 · Unit 4A common-opinion objection claims laxative juice and binding residue; author replies in S005.
- Book Two · Chapter 3 · Unit 5The residue's purported binding does not refute the substance's one nutritive power in the author's answer.
Word family
Chou, jus and marc: one plant, different parts and effects. Exact historical spellings are listed separately.
Attested forms
choux; jus; marc; lasche le ventre; reserre; marc n’est pas de la substance; aucune vertu nutritive; chou