Argument language and qualification

Qualification and attribution

quodammodo; ut ita dicam; ut ita loquar; forsitan; arbitror; a quibusdam; ut quidam putant; apud Platonicos

These phrases limit a predication, introduce approximate wording, express a tentative judgment, or attribute a claim.

From the book

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I

Marsilio Ficino · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordThese phrases limit a predication, introduce approximate wording, express a tentative judgment, or attribute a claim.
  • In the Platonic TheologyQuodammodo allows forms or powers to be predicated in a qualified respect.
  • In this editionThe translation usually preserves these as “in a certain sense,” “so to speak,” “perhaps,” “some,” or “I believe.”
  • A place to readUt quidam putant reserves one account of knowing matter through the idea of form.

Meaning

These phrases limit a predication, introduce approximate wording, express a tentative judgment, or attribute a claim. They are small expressions with large effects on what the text actually asserts.

Use in the book

Quodammodo allows forms or powers to be predicated in a qualified respect. Ut ita dicam and ut ita loquar mark conscious adjustments of language, including imitation of divine form and the ordering of beings. Forsitan makes the proposed rationale for a Zoroastrian saying tentative. A quibusdam limits one formulation of the necessity of divine willing to unnamed thinkers; sunt et qui likewise introduces the empyrean classification. Arbitror marks Ficino’s assessment that an argument has been established or a riddle resolved. Such qualifications are neither all expressions of doubt nor all dispensable ornaments. Some mark a claim’s mode, some its source, and some the confidence with which it is advanced. The immediate context determines which.

Selected annotated passages.

Places to read

  1. II.11.19Ut quidam putant reserves one account of knowing matter through the idea of form.
  2. II.12.8Forsitan and quodammodo qualify the self-production attribution.
  3. III.1.23Arbitror marks the claimed solution of Xenocrates’s riddle.
  4. III.2.4Sunt et qui introduces a reported cosmological classification.

Translation in this edition

The translation usually preserves these as “in a certain sense,” “so to speak,” “perhaps,” “some,” or “I believe.” A glossary or shortened quotation must retain the locally important restriction even when English can otherwise smooth it away.

aut semper aut plurimum

aut semper aut plurimum. Printed forms: aut semper aut plurimum.

Always or for the most part. The qualification limits the regularity claim about natural paths and works; it should not be rewritten as exceptionless observed success. References: II.13.9. See Qualification and attribution.

coniectari

coniectari. Printed forms: coniectari.

Infer or conjecture. Ficino marks an inferential step from the comparative efficacy of intellect to the force of divine will. References: II.11.32. See Qualification and attribution.

Deus ipse viderit

Deus ipse viderit. Printed forms: Deus ipse viderit.

Let God himself see to or judge it. The phrase marks Ficino’s express reservation after Plotinus’s reported conclusion. References: II.12.11. See Qualification and attribution.

dubitatio / respondere

dubitatio / respondere. Printed forms: dubitatio; Respondeamus.

Difficulty or doubt / answer. The self-motion objection is stated before the painter analogy provides a response; it should not be mistaken for Ficino’s final denial. References: III.1.27. See Qualification and attribution.

dumtaxat

dumtaxat. Printed forms: dumtaxat.

Only, restricting a stated class. Intellectual operation is assigned only to the more excellent kinds; the restriction identifies its narrower distribution. References: II.11.12. See Qualification and attribution.

ferme / ut ita loquar

ferme / ut ita loquar. Printed forms: ferme; ut ita loquar.

Almost or approximately / so to speak. These qualify angel’s likeness to divine immobility and prevent the comparison from erasing its inferior mode. References: III.1.13. See Qualification and attribution.

forsitan / quodammodo

forsitan / quodammodo. Printed forms: forsitan; quodammodo.

Perhaps / in a certain way. Both qualifications limit the proposed explanation of the saying about divine self-production. References: II.12.8. See Qualification and attribution.

immo / potius / minime

immo / potius / minime. Printed forms: immo; Minime.

Rather, indeed, or by no means. These words sharpen a correction or rejection: the text revises bare-nature language and denies that soul fills body like a divided quality. References: II.11.12, III.2.10. See Qualification and attribution.

inquam / inquit

inquam / inquit. Printed forms: inquam; inquit.

I say / he says. Inquam reinforces or clarifies the author’s assertion, whereas inquit can introduce an attributed authority’s words. Their voices should not be merged. References: II.11.37, II.11.38. See Qualification and attribution.

occasio / nancisci

occasio / nancisci. Printed forms: occasionem nacti.

An occasion found or obtained. Ficino marks the Ideas discussion as an excursus arising almost by chance, without making chance his cosmic first cause. References: II.11.21. See Qualification and attribution.

puta

puta. Printed forms: puta.

For example or namely. The parenthetical introduces bodies and qualities as examples of things moved by another; it is not an assertion attributed to a thinker. References: III.1.23. See Qualification and attribution.

putare / arbitrari

putare / arbitrari. Printed forms: arbitror; putant.

Think, judge, or hold. These verbs can mark an attributed doctrine or Ficino’s own assessment of a proof’s success; they do not always express doubt. References: II.11.19, III.1.23. See Qualification and attribution.

quandoque

quandoque. Printed forms: quandoque.

At some time, eventually, or at length. The substance argument uses it within a possibility claim; the transition in III.2.1 instead means coming at last to the desired subject. References: II.11.5, III.2.1. See Qualification and attribution.

quorsum

quorsum. Printed forms: Quorsum.

To what end or why this discussion? The rhetorical question signals the conclusion: unactualized, noncontradictory possibilities fall within divine power. References: II.12.18. See Qualification and attribution.

solus / solum

solus / solum. Printed forms: solum; solus.

Alone or only. God alone creates matter without a subject; action through bare nature alone is rejected as sufficient. This exclusivity vocabulary is unrelated to sol, the sun. References: II.11.9, II.11.10. See Qualification and attribution.

suspicari

suspicari. Printed forms: suspicetur.

Suspect or entertain a supposition. The warning forbids entertaining the thought that God’s being and activity occur by chance; this differs from suspicere, look upward. References: II.12.2. See Qualification and attribution.

volente Deo

volente Deo. Printed forms: volente Deo.

God willing. The conventional qualification accompanies the announced next proof and differs from the technical analysis of divine will that follows. References: II.11.24. See Qualification and attribution.