Argument and language

Not and neither

οὔτε (oute); μή (mē)

Negation and an opposed positive predicate are different.

From the book

Symposium

Plato · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordNegation and an opposed positive predicate are different.
  • In the SymposiumDiotima makes this distinction explicit and supplies right opinion as a counterexample to an exhaustive binary division.
  • Reading contextDiotima makes this distinction explicit and supplies right opinion as a counterexample to an exhaustive binary division.
  • A place to readThe false move from negation to a contrary is corrected.

Meaning

Negation and an opposed positive predicate are different. Not beautiful need not mean ugly; not knowledgeable need not mean ignorant.

Use in the book

Diotima makes this distinction explicit and supplies right opinion as a counterexample to an exhaustive binary division. At the summit a long chain of negations removes becoming, destruction, variable beauty and dependence on another thing. Those exclusions jointly characterize the final object; no isolated negative should be treated as its complete positive definition.

Places to read

  1. 201e–202b2The false move from negation to a contrary is corrected.
  2. 210e–211b2Coordinated denials establish invariance and independence.

μή (mē)

mē — Not in the constructions appropriate to conditions, general descriptions and dependent clauses.

  • 202b — ὃ μὴ καλόν ἐστιν. What is not beautiful must not be forced to be ugly.

Read: Not and neither.

οὔτε (oute)

oute — Neither or nor; coordinates denials without supplying a positive contrary.

  • 201e — οὔτε καλὸς. Love is reported as neither beautiful nor good by Socrates’ earlier account.

Read: Not and neither.