From the book
Candida Phoenix Philosophica
Anonymous · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordPhlegm names the insipid remainder of aged distilled waters in a critical example.
- In the CandidaIt follows the claim that taste, smell and colour belong to a thing’s soul, life and quintessence.
- TranslationThe English keeps phlegm as a historical chymical term, without restricting it to respiratory mucus.
- A place to readRead pp. 21–22, where the sensory account is tested through spoiled medicines and a decayed apple.
Meaning
Phlegm has a specific chymical sense in this passage. The author describes what remains when distilled medicinal waters grow old and lose taste, smell and colour. Rendering it only as bodily mucus would make the example incoherent. It names a depleted watery remainder as judged through the author’s account of sensible virtues.
The occurrence is narrow, but it is not trivial. It clarifies why the text distinguishes a useful spirit or essence from merely having some liquid left in a vessel. Appearance as water is not sufficient proof of retained medicinal excellence.
Use in the book
At p. 21 rainwater is said to contain every colour, and Hollandus is cited for the three spirits in natural warmth: taste, smell and colour. These are called the soul, life and quintessence of things (I.021.1). The author connects this to rainwater’s sweetness and pleasantness. Sensible qualities therefore bear an explanatory relation to inward power in the local argument.62
The next page addresses Aristotelian philosophers who, the author says, commonly maintain the contrary. He declines an extended quarrel but asks them to remember their own apothecaries’ waters. When these have aged and lost the three properties, nothing remains but Phlegma (I.022.1). The aside that this still sometimes serves poor patients as medicine adds criticism of practice to the theoretical example.
A decayed apple supplies the parallel. When it has lost smell, taste and colour through rotting, only Excrementum remains. The comparison links phlegm with waste in a functional account of lost virtue. It does not establish that the two words are strict synonyms in every passage, or that their ordinary substances are chemically identical.
The later substance-residue distinction supplies a wider reading connection. Lower bodies are said to contain essential substance and accidental residues that mingle with and distort purity but can be removed by art (II.218.2). The phlegm example is earlier and more concrete; it should not be forced into a full analysis of that later ontology. Together, however, the passages show the author’s concern to distinguish useful essence from an unproductive or obscuring remainder.
Places to read
- Part I · I.021.1; I.022.12The sensory triad, spoiled distilled waters and decayed apple.
- Part II · II.218.2The later distinction of substance and accidental residues.
Translation
Phlegma is translated “phlegm” with a contextual explanation. Gebrandte Wasser is rendered distilled waters in the apothecary setting. The translation does not silently insert a specific modern distillate or presume that the word denotes one chemically uniform fraction.
Connections
Quintessence explains the positive claim immediately preceding phlegm. Distillation concerns the operation that produces the apothecaries’ waters, while Residues explains the broader waste vocabulary. Medicine and its orders is useful for distinguishing the polemic against depleted remedies from a complete judgment of every medicine available in shops.
Cautions
Loss of taste, smell and colour is the author’s historical criterion in this example, not a sufficient modern test of medicinal efficacy or safety. The passage does not establish that every colourless, odourless water is useless. Its object is the aging of preparations that previously possessed the named properties.
Phlegma
Phlegma — phlegm. I.022.1.
gebrandte Wasser
gebrandte Wasser — distilled waters. I.022.1.
Source note
The sarcastic parenthesis at I.022.1 says that the remaining phlegm must sometimes still serve poor patients as medicine. This is the author’s criticism, not a recommendation by the edition to use such a remainder.