From the book
Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum
Heinrich Khunrath · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordCain appears once, in the p. 74 margin, as the addressee of a furious charge of lying.
- In KhunrathThe body has just allowed that certain metallic preparations can serve transmuting tinctures or particulars, provided an indispensable further condition is met.
- In this editionPreserve the vocative rather than inventing an identified contemporary opponent.
- A reading distinctionThe body’s conditional concession and the margin’s anger are simultaneous features of the source; neither should be allowed to erase the other.
Meaning
Cain appears once, in the p. 74 margin, as the addressee of a furious charge of lying. The gloss asks whether the position just explained amounts to a philosopher obscuring everything, and declares the accusation magnificently false.
Use in the book
The body has just allowed that certain metallic preparations can serve transmuting tinctures or particulars, provided an indispensable further condition is met. The continuation identifies that condition as employment of the true first matter. The marginal taunt thus accompanies an effort to distinguish a conditional allowance from indiscriminate denial.
“Cain” lends the exchange a scriptural register of hostility. It need not be the critic's personal name, and the page narrates no literal killing. The defensible claim is that Khunrath assigns an adversarial biblical role to someone whose accusation he rejects.
This single sharp occurrence is worth indexing because it reveals how a technical qualification can be accompanied by moral escalation at the page edge.
Places to read
- 1599 p. 74A conditional allowance for metallic preparations forms the immediate context
- 1599 p. 74 · marginCain is apostrophized in the denial of a charge of philosophical obscurity
- 1599 p. 75The indispensable first-matter condition completes the explanation
Translation in this edition
Preserve the vocative rather than inventing an identified contemporary opponent. The passage does not supply a Genesis chapter or verse.
Source note
The body’s conditional concession and the margin’s anger are simultaneous features of the source; neither should be allowed to erase the other.