Conscience and responsibility

Truth and hatred

Warheit; VERITAS DOMINI; Veritas odium parit; Merces Doctorum; Stummer Hund; ad ædificationem Veritatis

Truth is both the criterion of the argument and the cause in whose service Khunrath explains his public speech.

From the book

Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum

Heinrich Khunrath · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordTruth is both the criterion of the argument and the cause in whose service Khunrath explains his public speech.
  • In KhunrathAt p. 10 the old proverb makes enemies for truth's sake an honour among those who understand.
  • In this editionRetain “truth” in the adapted scriptural wording.
  • A reading distinctionThe p. 182 margin cites Psalm 40:10.

Meaning

Truth is both the criterion of the argument and the cause in whose service Khunrath explains his public speech. This article concerns the latter register: the truth-loving philosopher may incur hatred and ingratitude but must not become a dumb dog. The repeated claim that truth endures supplies perseverance, while the duty to speak answers demands that the author remain silent.

Use in the book

At p. 10 the old proverb makes enemies for truth's sake an honour among those who understand. The author later asserts that truth is always consonant with itself, a reason to test alleged knowledge by nature-conforming speech. These claims give disagreement different possible meanings: it may require careful examination, but hostile noise and personal disparagement cannot by themselves refute the doctrine.

The closing sequence on pp. 180–183234 intensifies this position through biblical and proverbial voices. An opponent behaves as Zedekiah challenging Micaiah; the echo promises an answer fitting the provocation. Khunrath anticipates the world's thanks that Christ, apostles and confessors of truth have received, and the margin says truth breeds hatred. The entrusted pound then becomes a duty to help truth according to one's capacity. Silence would leave sophistry dominant and the liar unanswered.

David supplies the positive speech-act. Khunrath will preach truth in the great congregation and will not allow his mouth to be stopped. He knows and recognizes Magnesia, therefore he speaks and writes. The Devil's anger is no sufficient reason to stop. At p. 183 he suggests that this public confession may help confirm the doctrine of God's Son to doubters through Nature.

Public confession is not the same as complete public disclosure. The book withholds the matter's common identifying name and reserves fuller demonstrations for the proper conditions, while defending the publication of its doctrine. This distinction explains how a treatise committed to secrecy can nevertheless represent silence as a moral failure. What is to be declared and what is to be reserved are different objects of duty.

The lexicon should preserve the first-person and argumentative nature of these declarations. They are evidence of Khunrath's conception of authorship and conflict, not independent confirmation that every critic persecutes truth or that hostility proves a thesis.

Places to read

  1. 1599 p. 10Enemies for truth’s sake are placed within a proverb about honour
  2. 1599 p. 158Truth’s consonance supplies the standard for evaluating philosophical speech
  3. 1599 p. 176 · marginThe truth of the Lord is declared to endure for ever
  4. 1599 p. 181 · marginTruth breeding hatred accompanies the author’s expectation of ingratitude
  5. 1599 p. 182David’s confession and the dumb-dog image justify speaking despite opposition
  6. 1599 p. 183Public teaching may confirm the Son’s doctrine to doubters through Nature

Translation in this edition

Retain “truth” in the adapted scriptural wording. The modern note observes that Khunrath puts it where the cited psalm speaks of righteousness; normalizing to a familiar Bible would erase his emphasis. “Confession” here need not mean disclosure of a full recipe or the separate book titled Confessio.

Source note

The p. 182 margin cites Psalm 40:10. The allusion to the dumb dog is identified as Isaiah 56:10 in the modern apparatus rather than in a printed reference beside that phrase. The mixed-language tag Merces Doctorum; vndanck in fine laborum retains a German word inside Latin framing. Its bitterness is part of the argument’s voice, not a typographical fault to be repaired.