Supernatural explanations and disputed connections

Characters

Characters

A “character” can be an inscribed sign, a distinguishing mark, or a description of someone's characteristic conduct.

From the book

The Anatomy of Melancholy

Robert Burton · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordA “character” can be an inscribed sign, a distinguishing mark, or a description of someone's characteristic conduct.
  • In the Anatomy of MelancholyThe preface promises a “brief character” of Democritus: a sketch of what sort of man he was, accompanied by an epitome of his life.
  • In this edition“Characters” becomes “written symbols” in the imagination discussion and “inscribed signs” in the question about lawful cures.
  • A place to readthe promised portrait of Democritus

Meaning

A “character” can be an inscribed sign, a distinguishing mark, or a description of someone's characteristic conduct. Burton's “characters” accordingly include magical symbols, recognizable symptoms, moral traits and literary portraits. The adjective “Characteristical” means bearing such signs when applied to talismanic images or seals. Its local force comes from what is marked or represented, not from a single magical sense governing every occurrence.

Use in the book

The preface promises a “brief character” of Democritus: a sketch of what sort of man he was, accompanied by an epitome of his life. Later Burton invokes Theophrastus's Characters as a model for writing that might help descendants correct their faults. The literary description becomes a moral instrument, although the next warning says a reader already suffering from melancholy can harm himself by applying general symptoms to his own case; Burton moves from advising avoidance to cautious reading, while recommending the rest for benefit. In the account of avarice, a “Character of a covetous man” supplies a concrete example: a man repeatedly checks his locked possessions despite his wife's assurances. The supplied note identifies the underlying Theophrastean sketch as Distrustfulness. Burton's heading and appropriation remain visible; the edition does not quietly rename his example.

The family includes the act of portrayal: Pliny “characterizeth” a discontented person who cannot accept anyone above him, before Seneca’s advancing offices illustrate the same insatiability. Burton also cites Hall “in Charact.” for envy’s living skeleton. A separate marginal reference names Pignorius’s “Ægypt characters” in a discussion of sacrifices; that short title supplies a reading reference, without establishing here the work’s full title or a detailed account of its signs.

Character can also concern the manner a person displays. The opportunist has a different “face, garb, & character” for everyone he meets, changing himself for advantage. This is an assumed presentation among the many roles Burton describes. The “characters of true Gentry” are, by contrast, marks of conduct such as courtesy and generosity, set against fine appearances in a coinage metaphor. The preceding argument allows good qualities to outweigh ancestry and status, then returns to the claim that good birth shows in conduct. The coinage comparison and conditional praise sit within that tension. His accompanying condemnation of peasants is Burton’s social prejudice, not an established account of a class’s character. The air digression similarly asks what produces a nation's distinctive character, canvasses environmental and celestial explanations, and explicitly calls the cited stellar explanation inadequate.

In the definition of melancholy, the “character of Mortality” is the mark of being mortal: nobody escapes the passing sorrow under discussion. This general claim must retain “in this sense,” which points to temporary melancholy rather than asserting that every person has the established disease. Medical “Characters” then mark particular conditions. Fear and sorrow are called the characters of most melancholy, “not all.” The later symptoms section first reports a universalizing medical maxim, then challenges it through exceptions: some sufferers are sad without fear, some fearful without sadness, some neither. Burton explicitly concludes that sufferers are usually, not always, sad and fearful. Sorrow’s subsequent designation as “the other Character” nevertheless resumes sweeping claims about all writers and all sufferers. Both the qualification and the renewed generalization belong to the account; the noun alone does not establish an exceptionless diagnostic test.

The material signs occur in another explanatory register. Witchcraft's alleged instruments include “characters stamped of sundry metals,” made under selected celestial configurations. They are signs made at those times, not pictures of constellations. The next paragraph denies that the spells, characters and unintelligible words possess power in themselves: the Devil supposedly employs them to deceive the practitioners. That agency claim is essential to the passage. Burton's assertion about demonic deception must be distinguished both from the preceding reports of afflicted patients and from a general definition of character.

The imagination discussion begins affirmatively: “We see commonly” such cures, including cures through characters. The weapon-salve claim is then disputed, while Burton’s following explanation denies intrinsic power to charms and assigns the effect to strong imagination and belief. The later treatment section separately asks whether the means work and whether they are lawful. It moves through rival opinions to assertions that famous cures occur daily and that such cures can be done, before rejecting the inference from efficacy to moral permission. Later still, Burton allows a change of mind about a natural amulet but immediately excludes medicines consisting of words, characters, spells and charms: any supposed good is assigned to powerful conviction or the Devil's contrivance. His distinction concerns the proposed agency and moral status of the remedy; it does not classify every object worn or tied on the body alike.

In love and jealousy, characters are alleged instruments for compelling affection, relieving enchantment or securing marital harmony. Erastus reports witches’ claims; Paracelsus supplies a conditional cause-and-cure requirement; astrologers propose sign-bearing images. The philter debate proceeds through contrary alleged cases, then distinguishes direct demonic action from the power of charms and from asserted natural causes, ending with a qualified comparison to legendary charms. Burton calls the love remedies unlawful, and the seal of Venus belongs to practices magicians “put upon us.” The technical adjectives describe the symbols carried by images or seals, while the surrounding verbs and judgements establish how far the claims are credited. In the religious-melancholy discussion, characters recur in a polemical catalogue of ceremonies and exorcisms that Burton rejects in favour of a simpler invocation.

Related entries

Fascination; Ligation and ligature; Amulet; Philter; Imagination; Fear; Sorrow; Astrology; Sympathy and antipathy

Places to read

  1. · paragraph 5–7the promised portrait of Democritus
  2. · paragraph 25–28Theophrastus's Characters and the intended benefits and risks of reading
  3. · paragraph 28–29an opportunist's changing character
  4. · paragraph 2–4passing melancholy as the mark of mortality
  5. · paragraph 11–13fear and sorrow characterize most, not all, melancholy
  6. · paragraph 53–55stamped signs and the subsequent denial of their intrinsic power
  7. · paragraph 26–34affirmed cure effects, disputed weapon salve and imagination as the explanation
  8. · paragraph 3–6Hall’s abbreviated Characters title and the portrait of envy
  9. · paragraph 16–18Burton's covetous man and the literary example's attribution
  10. · paragraph 22–29the qualified symptom account and sorrow's distinguishing mark
  11. · paragraph 34–DJR-68-5efficacy, lawfulness and the return to accepted medicine
  12. · paragraph 31–33national character and an inadequate stellar explanation
  13. · paragraph 8–16marks of gentility amid the coinage comparison and class polemic
  14. · paragraph 52–DJR-91-1characterizeth as portraying an insatiable complainer
  15. · paragraph 30–33natural amulet contrasted with verbal and inscribed charms
  16. · paragraph 23–28disputed compulsion of affection, followed by honourable love and its unforced graces
  17. · paragraph 1–19witches’ claims, contrary cases, competing agencies and the qualified comparison
  18. · paragraph 47–54prohibited love remedies and sign-bearing images
  19. · paragraph 9–11astrologically timed characteristical seal
  20. · paragraph 15–18the cited Ægypt characters in the sacrificial catalogue
  21. signs in Burton's criticism of elaborate exorcisms

In this edition

“Characters” becomes “written symbols” in the imagination discussion and “inscribed signs” in the question about lawful cures. “Characters stamped” appears as “signs stamped” in a longer construction specifying metal and timing. The words magical or inscribed clarify the context; they should not migrate into the diagnostic or literary senses. “Sorrow is the other Character” becomes “Sorrow is the other distinguishing mark,” while “character of Mortality” becomes “mark of mortality.”

The “brief character” is rendered through the verb “sketched” in a recast clause, not by a single interchangeable noun. Theophrastus's “characters” remains Characters as a title, and the opportunist's “character” remains character. “Characteristicall Images” becomes “images bearing magical signs”; “a Characteristical Seal” becomes “a seal bearing magical characters.” The expanded English makes the relationship explicit: image or seal is the object, and the characters are its signs. These are checked supplied-rendering choices, not an independent collation of Theophrastus or the cited magical authorities.

character · brief character

Printed “brief character” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Citation convention

Short descriptive portrait of a person.

Context: Burton announces the literary portrait that follows; modern recasts the noun as a verb.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: untill I have set down a brief character of this our Democritus

Modern rendering: until I have sketched this Democritus of ours

Word and construction: Set down a brief character is recast as have sketched; this is a whole verbal construction, not a noun-to-noun equivalence. Brief is not separately rendered as an adjective in this selected modern clause.

Alignment convention

character · characters · local use 1

Printed “characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

The literary sketches invoked as an example of morally useful writing.

Context: Burton invokes the transmitted proem; the attached note qualifies its attribution.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: as Theophrastus did by his characters

Modern rendering: Like Theophrastus with his Characters

Word and construction: Characters is a literary title. As...did by becomes Like...with in the recast English; this title use must not be confused with printed marginal Characteres or its editorial discussion.

Alignment convention

character

Printed “character” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Assumed manner or persona adapted to an audience.

Context: The opportunist changes for advantage; several means different here.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: having a several face, garb, & character for every one he meets

Modern rendering: with a different face, manner, and character for everyone he meets

Word and construction: Several means different, having becomes with, and garb is rendered manner; character remains character as the adopted presentation. Every one preserves the original universal scope.

Alignment convention

character · character of Mortality

Printed “character of Mortality” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Citation convention

Distinguishing mark of mortal life, referring specifically to passing melancholy.

Context: In this sense restricts the universal claim to the foregoing melancholy dispositions.

Source: original body

Source wording: Melancholy in this sense is the character of Mortality

character · Characters · local use 1

Printed “Characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Defining signs with an explicit exception to universality.

Context: Burton endorses Hercules de Saxonia’s exception: most, not all.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: Fear and Sorrow are the true Characters, and inseparable companions of most Melancholy, not all

Modern rendering: Fear and sorrow are the defining marks and inseparable companions of most melancholy, though not all

Word and construction: True Characters is rendered defining marks. The qualifier most...not all is retained, with though supplied to make the contrast explicit; it governs the medical generalization rather than altering the noun’s dictionary meaning.

Alignment convention

character · characters stamped

Printed “characters stamped” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Citation convention

Meaning: Signs or symbols that have been stamped.

Here: Symbols impressed on metals under selected constellations.

Context: Alleged magical instruments; the following unit denies power intrinsic to the signs.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: characters stamped of sundry metals, and at such and such constellations

Modern rendering: signs stamped on various metals under particular constellations

Word and construction: Characters stamped corresponds to signs stamped. Sundry metals supplies various metals; and at such and such constellations is rendered under particular constellations, specifying the chosen time/configuration rather than the pictured content of the signs.

Alignment convention

character · characters · local use 2

Printed “characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Magical signs denied inherent efficacy.

Context: Burton assigns the deceptive use to the Devil, rather than the signs themselves.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: Not that there is any power at all in those spels, charmes, characters, and barbarous words

Modern rendering: It is not that these spells, charms, signs and barbarous words have any power in themselves

Word and construction: The governing Not that denies intrinsic power. The modern It is and in themselves complete or explicate that compressed construction; the later Devil’s agency is a distinct explanation, not a denial that anything occurs.

Alignment convention

character · Characters · local use 2

Printed “Characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Written signs in Burton’s assertion of observed cures and the following dispute over mechanism.

Context: We see commonly affirms the reported effects in Burton’s expository voice. The explicitly opposed writers concern the weapon-salve claim; the next paragraph denies intrinsic power to charms and asserts imagination and belief as their explanation.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: Spels, Words, Characters, and Charms

Modern rendering: spells, words, written symbols and charms

Word and construction: Characters becomes written symbols, with written an explicit contextual explanation. The other three items remain separate. The wider sentence’s We see commonly is not an interrogative or a neutral catalogue of others’ claims.

Alignment convention

character · Character of a covetous man

Printed “Character of a covetous man” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Citation convention

Literary sketch used as an example of anxious avarice.

Context: Burton’s description of Theophrastus’s sketch; supplied note identifies its title as Distrustfulness.

Source: original body

Source wording: his Character of a covetous man

character · characters of melancholy

Printed “characters of melancholy” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Printed form, Source wording: characters of melancholy

Citation convention

Distinguishing signs in a reported medical maxim whose universality is challenged next.

Context: The initial maxim requires prolonged fear and sorrow; Burton endorses objections at058-24 and explicitly concludes usually, not always, at058-27, before continuing with further sweeping cited formulations.

Source: original body

character · Character

Printed “Character” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Distinguishing symptom in the qualified discussion of sorrow.

Context: Burton resumes sweeping language, including all writers witness and they all grieve, after the explicit usually-not-always conclusion at058-27. Both rhetorical levels remain visible; the noun is not an exceptionless diagnostic definition.

Source: original body

Source wording: Sorrow is the other Character

character · Characters · local use 3

Printed “Characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Inscribed magical signs in a question about efficacy and lawfulness.

Context: Interrogative catalogue, followed by a separate lawfulness question.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: Charmes, Characters, Images

Modern rendering: charms, inscribed signs, images

Word and construction: Characters is rendered inscribed signs, with inscribed explaining the contextual kind of sign. The flanking charms and images remain separate means; their efficacy and lawfulness are separately questioned in the sentence.

Alignment convention

character · distinct character

Printed “distinct character” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Citation convention

Supposed distinctive collective disposition.

Context: Question canvassing historical environmental and celestial explanations, not a verified population claim.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: Whence proceed that variety of manners, and a distinct character (as it were) to severall nations?

Modern rendering: What produces that variety of customs and gives different nations a distinct character, so to speak?

Word and construction: The full question includes the original Whence proceed, expanded into What produces...and gives. As it were becomes so to speak. Gives is not a word contained in the indexed noun phrase distinct character.

Alignment convention

character · characters of true Gentry

Printed “characters of true Gentry” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Citation convention

Recognizable moral qualities of gentility within a conditional contrast.

Context: If he retains these qualities; Burton’s ensuing class generalizations remain attributed prejudice.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: those ancient characters of true Gentry

Modern rendering: those ancient marks of true gentility

Word and construction: Characters becomes marks and Gentry gentility. Those ancient remains explicit; the if condition belongs to the surrounding sentence and limits the resulting praise.

Alignment convention

character · characters · local use 3

Printed “characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Magical inscriptions whose supposed effect is assigned to conviction or demonic contrivance.

Context: Burton rejects these remedies after distinguishing the claimed hidden natural powers of amulets.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: words, characters, spels, and charms

Modern rendering: words, signs, spells and charms

Word and construction: Characters becomes signs between separately rendered words, spells and charms. Strong conviction and the Devil’s contrivance are the stated possible sources of good in the surrounding exception, not independent powers of the signs.

Alignment convention

character · characters · local use 4

Printed “characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Magical symbols proposed as means of compelling love or hatred.

Context: A debate attributed to Tandler and others; next unit says honourable love cannot be forced.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: whether Love and Hatred may be compelled by philters or characters

Modern rendering: whether love and hatred can be compelled by love potions or magical symbols

Word and construction: Characters becomes magical symbols, with magical contextual. Whether and may/can preserve a debated capacity; love and hatred are the proposed objects, not merely love.

Alignment convention

character · Charact.

Printed “Charact.” (English; lemma). Attestation: abbreviated title.

Citation convention

Meaning: Characters: an abbreviated title of literary portraits.

Here: Hall’s portrayal of envy as a living skeleton is another literary character used to explain a passion.

Context: Burton cites Hall after the lean carcass image. The exact Hall locator is not supplied, and the independent work has not been collated.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: Hall in Charact.

Modern rendering: Hall, Characters

Word and construction: The supplied rendering expands the printed title abbreviation Charact. to Characters and omits the citation preposition in; it is a book title, not an additional magical sign.

Alignment convention

character · characters · local use 5

Printed “characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Meaning: Distinctive dispositions or traits; plural.

Here: Collective differences allegedly produced by stellar arrangement, in the explanation Burton rejects.

Context: Scaliger is named at 074-10; Burton calls this explanation weak and insufficient, then argues from the failure of countries to change with the stars. Bodin’s different angelic explanation follows.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: to make diversity of countries, soils, maners, customs, characters and constitutions among us

Modern rendering: to create among us differences of countries, soils, manners, customs, characters, and constitutions

Word and construction: The full list keeps among us, moved earlier in the supplied rendering; characters is one item among countries, soils, manners, customs and constitutions. The rejected causal explanation is not the definition of the noun.

Alignment convention

character · Characters · local use 4

Printed “Characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Meaning: Inscribed signs or symbols; plural.

Here: Signs are alleged instruments of compelling affection or hatred and causing storms and diseases.

Context: Erastus reports what witches claim; the subsequent dispute distinguishes charms’ agency from the Devil’s direct action and from natural explanations. Neither the claim nor the magical signs’ efficacy is established merely by listing them.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: by Charms, Spels, Characters, Knots

Modern rendering: by charms, spells, magical signs and knots

Word and construction: Characters gives magical signs, with magical supplied from the context. Charms, Spels and Knots are distinct items; the preceding attributed take upon them governs the catalogue.

Alignment convention

character · Characters · local use 5

Printed “Characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Meaning: Inscribed signs or symbols; plural.

Here: Signs are prescribed as the required remedy under the premise of magical causation.

Context: The conditional and necessity belong to Paracelsus’s stated cause-and-cure argument. Burton has called the means unlawful at 139-48 and immediately repeats the prohibition at 139-50.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: If forced by Spels and Philters, saith Paracelsus, it must be eased by Characters

Modern rendering: If imposed by spells and love potions, says Paracelsus, it must be relieved by magical signs

Word and construction: Characters corresponds only to magical signs; if, forced, and must be eased separately supply the premise and required remedy. The thing imposed and relieved is understood from the love-cure discussion.

Alignment convention

character · Ægypt characters

Printed “Ægypt characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: title phrase.

Citation convention

Meaning: Egyptian Characters: the cited short title as printed.

Here: A bibliographic use in a marginal reference for Egyptian sacrificial customs.

Context: Burton directs readers to chapter 1. The supplied passage does not establish the full original title or a detailed definition of the signs; no independent Pignoria collation or asserted magical effect is implied.

Source: original marginal quotation

Source wording, Original wording: Laurentius Pignorius his Ægypt characters

Modern rendering: Lorenzo Pignoria’s Egyptian Characters

Word and construction: The supplied wording modernizes the author’s name and renders Ægypt adjectivally as Egyptian. The phrase is a title in this citation, not a description of contemporary Egyptian people.

Alignment convention

Edition note: checked against original quotation and supplied translation within the accompanying note

character · characters · local use 6

Printed “characters” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Meaning: Inscribed signs or symbols; plural.

Here: Ritual signs are among the trappings Lemnius advises omitting in favour of simple invocation.

Context: The imperative advice is conditional on anyone attempting such a cure; Burton endorses Lemnius’s rejection of elaborate exorcisms and then calls Christ’s name alone the only charm.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: without all those jugling circumstances, Astrological elections of time, place, prodigious habits, fustian, big, sesquipedal words, spels, crosses, characters, which exorcists ordinarily use

Modern rendering: let him dispense with all those fraudulent trappings ordinarily used by exorcists: astrologically chosen times and places, outlandish costumes, bombast, grand words a foot and a half long, spells, crosses and magical signs

Word and construction: The whole negative instruction pairs without with let him dispense with, and keeps the reordered relative clause. Characters alone gives magical signs; the omission and the other trappings are supplied by separate words in the construction.

Alignment convention

characteristical · Characteristicall Images

Printed “Characteristicall Images” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Citation convention

Meaning: Images bearing signs or characters.

Here: Images bearing magical signs.

Context: Astrologers’ proposed effect in a catalogue already labelled unlawful.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: by Characteristicall Images

Modern rendering: through images bearing magical signs

Word and construction: Characteristicall is expanded into bearing magical signs, with magical contextual; Images is separately images, and by becomes through. The image or figure bears the signs.

Alignment convention

characteristical · Characteristical Seal

Printed “Characteristical Seal” (English; lemma). Attestation: phrase.

Citation convention

Meaning: A seal bearing signs or characters.

Here: Seal bearing magical symbols, made at an elected astrological time.

Context: Burton reports the proposal while calling such devices practices foisted upon us.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: a Characteristical Seal

Modern rendering: a seal bearing magical characters

Word and construction: Characteristical is expanded into bearing magical characters; Seal supplies seal and the indefinite article is already printed. The favourable Venus timing belongs to the following clause, not to the adjective’s definition.

Alignment convention

characterize

Printed “characterizeth” (English; lemma). Attestation: word form.

Citation convention

Meaning: Describes or portrays; third-person singular present.

Here: The verb introduces a portrait of a discontented person whose desire for advancement never ends.

Context: The attribution is Pliny, followed by Seneca’s ladder of offices; the exact Pliny formulation remains unlocated. Burton uses the portrait within a consolatory response to envy of wealth.

Source: original body

Source wording, Original wording: as Pliny characterizeth him

Modern rendering: as Pliny describes him

Word and construction: Pliny is the describing subject and him the person described. The verb describes a literary portrayal; it does not mean casting a charm or marking a patient.

Alignment convention