From the book
Candida Phoenix Philosophica
Anonymous · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordBier is named as a doctor in Amsterdam in an account communicated by a princely court physician.
- In the CandidaThe reported effects of his water contribute to the book’s arguments about stone formation and mineral specification.
- TranslationThe name and intermediary are retained; neither a secure full identity nor the water’s modern composition has been established.
- A place to readRead the report at pp. 117-118, II.117.2, and its return at pp. 157-158, II.157.1.
Meaning
Bier’s place in the Candida is evidential rather than doctrinal. He is not quoted as the author of a general theory. Instead, the anonymous writer reports what a court physician told him about Bier’s handling of an unusual water. The account thus has an explicit chain: Bier’s alleged operation, another physician’s report, and the author’s retelling. It is not presented as an experiment the author personally witnessed.
The name should accordingly remain modestly identified. The source locates Dr Bier at Amsterdam but supplies no first name, dated publication or independently checkable chemical analysis. The account can be discussed as testimony within the book without using it to reconstruct a biography or to identify the material.
Use in the book
At II.117.2 the water tastes pleasant and resembles whey in colour. When mixed with wine it becomes purple. The narrator corrects his first phrasing: more exactly, the water is coloured with the wine rather than simply colouring the wine. This small correction shows attention to the description, but it does not settle the chemical cause of the colour.147
Bier is then said to have placed the water in a furnace, removed it after considerable thickening, and found after cooling an extremely solid, transparent, somewhat green mass. In the surrounding discussion of precious stones, the account gives the author a case of an earthy or stony product arising from water. The report’s role is to support his proposed material relation between waters and mineral bodies. It is not a demonstration that the mass was a natural emerald under a modern classification.
The water returns in II.138.1 among the evidence invoked for mineral precursors. Mercury, Sulphur, Salt, mine vapours, colostrum and gur are explained as elements specified towards metals and minerals. The Bier account is made to support this wider conception of mineral water and unripe mineral matter. The move from the report to the general scheme belongs to the author’s argument.
At II.157.1 the same court physician is said to have added another detail: besides the transparent mass, Bier found a fine grain of gold at the bottom of the vessel. The author calls this bodily gold. It supports the distinction then being drawn between a particular product and the universal subject or medicine. A reported gold grain, even accepted on the author’s terms, would not by itself establish the possession of the universal tincture.
Places to read
- Part II · II.117.2The narrated water, purple colour, furnace treatment and transparent green mass.
- Part II · II.138.1Bier’s water is enlisted in the explanation of specified mineral precursors.
- Part II · II.157.1The report is supplemented by a grain of bodily gold and applied to terrestrial waters.
Translation
Granum Solis literally names a grain of the Sun; the edition renders the metallurgical reference as a grain of gold. Serum lactis supplies a colour comparison, whey, not a claim that the water contains milk. Bierischen is a German adjectival form meaning associated with Bier. Retaining Bier’s water is more accurate than inventing the name of a modern mineral water.
Connections
This entry illustrates the distinction between Authority and testimony and Experience and conjecture. Bier’s reported operation supplies a particular case, while the anonymous writer interprets it through his own elemental scheme. Keeping those stages separate helps readers assess the book’s evidence without either treating every report as established fact or dismissing its argumentative role.
Cautions
The starting place remains unnamed, the substance is unidentified, and the products were not analytically established by the edition. The account should not become a preparation recipe, a claim of verified transmutation or a reason to equate all green transparent masses with emerald.
Dr. Bier
Dr. Bier — Form as printed in the cited passage; the headword supplies the reading name. II.117.2.
Bierischen Wasser
Bierischen Wasser — Form as printed in the cited passage; the headword supplies the reading name. II.138.1.
granum Solis
granum Solis — Form as printed in the cited passage; the headword supplies the reading name. II.157.1.
Serum lactis
Serum lactis — Form as printed in the cited passage; the headword supplies the reading name. II.117.2.
Source note
The report reaches the narrator through an unnamed court physician. Its stated chain of testimony matters: the author does not claim to have performed Bier’s experiment himself. Compare II.117.2 and the return to the story at II.157.1.