From the book
Candida Phoenix Philosophica
Anonymous · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordMine vapours and related names describe stages or forms of mineral matter within conjectures about underground generation.
- In the CandidaThe book gathers a diverse mining vocabulary into elements specified towards minerals and metals.
- TranslationUnidentified materials retain their names; there is no automatic modern chemical equivalent.
- A place to readRead pp. 109–114 for the conjectures and pp. 138–139 for their conceptual reduction.
Meaning
The mining vocabulary provides the Candida with a language for matter that has not yet reached the state of a mature metal. Vapour, greasy material, mineral water, and unripe metal are not presented as independent species with fully established identities. They describe transitions in the proposed determination of universal matter within the earth. The vocabulary is concrete enough to evoke mining practice, yet the narrator repeatedly admits that the actual hidden process is conjectural.
One reported theory begins with Vapor Naturæ rising from the centre of the earth. The author says this might be called Einwitterung or Bergschwaden in miners’ speech. It takes up sulphurous moisture from rocks in clean warm places, becomes greasy, and changes its name from vapour to unctuosity. Name-change follows a proposed material change. It does not prove that every miner used the words with exactly the same scope.
The greasy stage may be called Metallferch. It meets pure, subtle, moist earth, fills pores, and unites with that earth. Pure warm conditions yield gold; other dispositions yield other metals. The narrator offers these as reported explanatory possibilities and later states his own qualified preference for a broadly similar model of universal spirit meeting predisposed matter and a matrix.
Use in the book
The author’s own synthesis on pp. 113–114 puts local conditions at the centre of specification. Veins and shafts can be pure or impure, warm or cold. After thickening, matter encounters a predisposed receiving material. One metal rather than another results according to these circumstances. The mine is not simply a container filled with finished metals; it is imagined as a differentiated environment within which the shared mineral basis acquires a particular condition.
At II.138.1 the vocabulary is gathered into a higher-level account. Mercury, Sulphur, Salt, Colostrum, Bergschwaden, Metallferck, Gur, and other names designate, in their respective cases, elements specified towards minerals and metals: mineral water and unripe metal or mineral. This passage supplies an interpretive principle for the earlier mining descriptions. The many names do not require many unrelated ultimate matters.
The reduction does not erase differences among stages. A vapour, an unctuous material, and a thickened mineral water have different roles in the narrated process. Their common grounding explains why the philosopher traces them back through the elements to God’s universal and substantial Word. The author is moving between local description and a general causal account, not claiming that each observed mine substance is physically identical in every respect.
Basilius Valentinus receives praise for writing plausibly about mines and metallic generation, especially through miners’ language. That praise concerns usefulness to the investigator. It does not revoke the narrator’s admission that even a celebrated mining master cannot give secure knowledge of the entire hidden process. Specialist language and conjectural restraint are allowed to coexist.
These passages also prevent a common mistake about the universal subject. A mine substance already specified towards a particular mineral is not, simply because it is called Mercury or a vapour, automatically the universal matter required for the highest work. The book’s larger distinction between universal and particular remains operative. Names must be interpreted by the state and role of the material they describe.90
Places to read
- Part II · II.109.2; II.110.12The proposed passage from vapour to sulphurous unctuosity and a metallic body.
- Part II · II.110.2; II.113.12Thick mineral water and the role of local conditions and matrix.
- Part II · II.114.1The value attributed to Basilius’s miners’ terminology.
- Part II · II.138.1The gathering of named precursors into specified elements and unripe mineral matter.
Translation
Bergschwaden is rendered “mine vapours.” Metallferch and the variant Metallferck are retained as historical terms, with the functional gloss of an unctuous precursor. Gur is likewise retained rather than assigned a modern chemical formula.
Colostrum is a received name in the list. The lexicon does not infer that the mine material is literal milk or identify it solely through the modern medical sense of that word.
Connections
Mother and matrix concerns the receiving conditions that make particular generation possible. Generation of metals concerns the disputed models as a whole. Mercury philosophical explains why a principle-name cannot by itself identify a common terrestrial substance as the subject of the art.
The backward tracing of mineral precursors parallels the tracing of the carnation through plant, seed, earth, and water. Both are completed by reference to the universal and substantial Word; their different kinds of generation remain distinct.
Cautions
This is not a glossary of standard modern mining terminology.
The narrator marks his linkage to Artephius’s process as conjectural. The reported vapour theory should not be promoted into a documented account of Artephius’s own mining observations.
Vapor Naturæ
Vapor Naturæ — Attested wording in the cited original passage. II.109.2.
Einwitterung
Einwitterung — Attested wording in the cited original passage. II.109.2.
Bergschwaden
Bergschwaden — Attested wording in the cited original passage. II.109.2.
Metallferch
Metallferch — Attested wording in the cited original passage. II.110.1.
Gur
Gur — Attested wording in the cited original passage. II.138.1.
Source note
II.138.1 says respectivè: the named materials are specified elements in their respective cases. Retaining that qualification avoids asserting that all the listed mine products are one indistinguishable substance.