From the book
Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum
Heinrich Khunrath · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordBernard is the Count and truth-speaking Trevisan of Khunrath's citations.
- In KhunrathPage 10 quotes from the second part of Bernard's book on the Hermetic Stone a saying attributed there to the Turba: searching where the desired thing is absent is vain.
- In this editionThe supplied apparatus identifies traditional Bernardian works, but page 133 does not establish precisely which edition or tract Khunrath used for that passage.
- A reading distinctionThe Errata correct familiaren to familiarem on page 132.
Meaning
Bernard is the Count and truth-speaking Trevisan of Khunrath's citations. The article concerns the figure and writings invoked in this treatise, rather than attempting to reconstruct a biography from the traditional name. Bernard is unusually important because he serves both the opening principle of correct matter and the later defence of knowledge before completed work.
Use in the book
Page 10 quotes from the second part of Bernard's book on the Hermetic Stone a saying attributed there to the Turba: searching where the desired thing is absent is vain. Khunrath turns it into the basis of the wrong-road warning. On pages 64–652 he anticipates an objection from Bernard's argument against bare elements or first matter. The answer distinguishes the view Bernard refuted from Khunrath's natural, already formed Magnesia; the acknowledged authority is not surrendered but reinterpreted within a more precise account of the subject.
Bernard's strongest role comes in pages 131–134234. He allegedly knew the Art two years before completing it. Khunrath gives a Latin passage and a German rendering about acquaintance with fifteen knowledgeable men and an interlocutor called Barbarinus or Barbarus. When Bernard admitted that he had not yet performed the work, this man tried to turn him from his purpose, and Bernard left his company. The episode directly parallels the attempt to discredit Khunrath's knowledge through incomplete preparation. If an opponent invokes Bernard's authority, he cannot easily deny the possibility Bernard asserts.
Page 156 supplies the converse use: Bernard prepared the Stone four times in old age, unlike the public tingents whose ability ended with their stock of tincture. Knowledge can precede success and can explain repeat preparation after success. These are Khunrath's uses of the Bernard tradition, not independent corroboration of the reported events.
Places to read
- 1599 p. 10Bernard transmits the maxim against seeking a thing where it is absent.
- 1599 p. 65His objection against bare elements is distinguished from the claim about formed Magnesia.
- 1599 p. 131Knowing the Art two years before completing it becomes the principal counterexample to the opponent.
- 1599 p. 133The Latin and German narrative explains Bernard’s break with a disputant who used his inexperience against him.
- 1599 p. 156The four preparations in old age supply the counterexample to tingents unable to reproduce their agent.
Translation in this edition
The supplied apparatus identifies traditional Bernardian works, but page 133 does not establish precisely which edition or tract Khunrath used for that passage. The German einem Barbaro should also not be enlarged into a biography of the interlocutor. The translation exposes the Latin/German variation rather than settling it by conjecture.
Source note
The Errata correct familiaren to familiarem on page 132. The correction repairs the Latin description of acquaintance; it does not alter the two-years-before-completion claim carried onto page 133.