Authorities and books

Authenticity of books

authentisch; Schrifftgemeß; Non igitur, quis dicat, sed quid dicatur, est attendendum; wo fern sie mit der Natur vbereinstimēn

A book's authority is conditional upon its agreement with the appropriate ground of truth.

From the book

Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum

Heinrich Khunrath · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordA book's authority is conditional upon its agreement with the appropriate ground of truth.
  • In KhunrathPage 110 first insists that he is not rejecting the philosophical corpus.
  • In this editionModern 'authentic' can mean that a document is not forged or is correctly attributed.
  • A reading distinctionThe printed word is divided as au- and thentisch around a marginal reference.

Meaning

A book's authority is conditional upon its agreement with the appropriate ground of truth. The word authentisch occurs in the comparison with theological writings that agree with biblical Scripture. Khunrath uses that comparison to explain his own acceptance of the Philosophers' books under Nature.

Use in the book

Page 110 first insists that he is not rejecting the philosophical corpus. The books remain good in a Nature-conforming understanding and insofar as they agree with Nature. The analogous statement about the Fathers and eminent theologians continues onto page 111: they are held authentic where they concord with Scripture in a Scripture-conforming way. The repeated construction makes agreement, rather than prestige alone, the stated condition of authority.

The ensuing sentence tells the reader to attend to what is said, not who says it, and whether it is said well or badly. This protects the investigation from being settled by a celebrated name. It also helps explain why Khunrath can call Geber, Ripley, and Paracelsus friends while loving Nature's truth more. His loyalty is not withdrawn by testing the author's meaning; testing is the proper form of that loyalty.

The wax-nose paragraph immediately adds the difficulty. Words can be bent toward arbitrary materials, particularly where the universal subject admits many predicates. Authenticity cannot therefore be established merely by producing an apparently favourable quotation. Reading requires the natural object, scope, and distinctions of the claim. The criterion is interpretive agreement, not a textual-authentication method for determining who historically wrote a manuscript. The latter question sometimes appears in the modern apparatus but is not what authentisch is doing here.

Places to read

  1. 1599 p. 109 · marginNature’s truth is placed above allegiance to named philosophical friends.
  2. 1599 p. 110Philosophical books are retained only in a Nature-conforming understanding, beginning the theological comparison.
  3. 1599 p. 111The word authentisch completes the condition of scriptural agreement, followed by attention to what rather than who.
  4. 1599 p. 112Nature’s touchstone controls the interpretation that gives philosophical writings their proper sense.

Translation in this edition

Modern 'authentic' can mean that a document is not forged or is correctly attributed. The primary comparison instead concerns warranted authority through agreement with Scripture, and analogously Nature. The article keeps this local sense separate from the source-critical problems discussed in the edition's notes on Aristotle, Senior, or other attributed works.

Source note

The printed word is divided as au- and thentisch around a marginal reference. This typographic interruption should not obscure that it belongs to the body of page 111.