DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Literary Fiction Collection · Bilingual Edition

Anatole France

The Gods Are Athirst

Les Dieux ont soif · Complete French–English bilingual edition

Explore the Lexicon
The Gods Are AthirstChapter IX · Paragraphs 1–14

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Facing Pages · Branch 43 of 120

Chapter IX · Paragraphs 1–14

Edition pages

Printed pages in the supplied Diotimos 2026 bilingual edition.

French
Diotimos 2026 pp. 164, 166, 168, 170
English
Diotimos 2026 pp. 165, 167, 169, 171

French

Évariste Gamelin devait entrer en fonctions le 14 septembre, lors de la réorganisation du Tribunal, divisé désormais en quatre sections, avec quinze jurés pour chacune. Les prisons regorgeaient; l’accusateur public travaillait dix-huit heures par jour. Aux défaites des armées, aux révoltes des provinces, aux conspirations, aux complots, aux trahisons, la Convention opposait la terreur. Les Dieux avaient soif.

La première démarche du nouveau juré fut de faire une visite de déférence au président Herman, qui le charma par la douceur de son langage et l’aménité de son commerce. Compatriote et ami de Robespierre, dont il partageait les sentiments, il laissait voir un cœur sensible et vertueux. Il était tout pénétré de ces sentiments humains, trop longtemps étrangers au cœur des juges et qui font la gloire éternelle d’un Dupaty et d’un Beccaria. Il se félicitait de l’adoucissement des mœurs qui s’était manifesté, dans l’ordre judiciaire, par la suppression de la torture et des supplices ignominieux ou cruels. Il se réjouissait de voir la peine de mort, autrefois prodiguée et servant naguère encore à la répression des moindres délits, devenue plus rare, et réservée aux grands crimes. Pour sa part, comme Robespierre, il l’eût volontiers abolie, en tout ce qui ne touchait pas à la sûreté publique. Mais il eût cru trahir l’État en ne punissant pas de mort les crimes commis contre la souveraineté nationale.

Tous ses collègues pensaient ainsi: la vieille idée monarchique de la raison d’État inspirait le Tribunal révolutionnaire. Huit siècles de pouvoir absolu avaient formé ses magistrats, et c’est sur les principes du droit divin qu’il jugeait les ennemis de la liberté.

Évariste Gamelin se présenta, le même jour, devant l’accusateur public, le citoyen Fouquier, qui le reçut dans le cabinet où il travaillait avec son greffier. C’était un homme robuste, à la voix rude, aux yeux de chat, qui portait sur sa large face grêlée, sur son teint de plomb, l’indice des ravages que cause une existence sédentaire et recluse aux hommes vigoureux, faits pour le grand air et les exercices violents. Les dossiers montaient autour de lui comme les murs d’un sépulcre, et, visiblement, il aimait cette paperasserie terrible qui semblait vouloir l’étouffer. Ses propos étaient d’un magistrat laborieux, appliqué à ses devoirs et dont l’esprit ne sortait pas du cercle de ses fonctions. Son haleine échauffée sentait l’eau-de-vie qu’il prenait pour se soutenir et qui ne semblait pas monter à son cerveau, tant il y avait de lucidité dans ses propos constamment médiocres.

Il vivait dans un petit appartement du Palais avec sa jeune femme, qui lui avait donné deux jumeaux. Cette jeune femme, la tante Henriette et la servante Pélagie composaient toute sa maison. Il se montrait doux et bon envers ces femmes. Enfin, c’était un homme excellent dans sa famille et dans sa profession, sans beaucoup d’idées et sans aucune imagination.

Gamelin ne put se défendre de remarquer avec quelque déplaisir combien ces magistrats de l’ordre nouveau ressemblaient d’esprit et de façons aux magistrats de l’ancien régime. Et c’en étaient: Herman avait exercé les fonctions d’avocat général au conseil d’Artois; Fouquier était un ancien procureur au Châtelet. Ils avaient gardé leur caractère. Mais Évariste Gamelin croyait à la palingénésie révolutionnaire.

En quittant le parquet, il traversa la galerie du Palais et s’arrêta devant les boutiques où toutes sortes d’objets étaient exposés avec art. Il feuilleta, à l’étalage de la citoyenne Ténot, des ouvrages historiques, politiques, et philosophiques: Les Chaînes de l’Esclavage; Essai sur le Despotisme; Les Crimes des Reines. "A la bonne heure! songea-t-il, ce sont des écrits républicains!" et il demanda à la librairie si elle vendait beaucoup de ces livres-là. Elle secoua la tête:

"On ne vend que des chansons et des romans."

Et tirant un petit volume d’un tiroir:

"Voici, ajouta-t-elle, quelque chose de bon."

Évariste lut le titre: La Religieuse en chemise.

Il trouva devant la boutique voisine Philippe Desmahis qui, superbe et tendre parmi les eaux de senteur, les poudres et les sachets de la citoyenne Saint-Jorre, assurait la belle marchande de son amour, lui promettait de lui faire son portrait et lui demandait un moment d’entretien dans le jardin des Tuileries, le soir. Il était beau. La persuasion coulait de ses lèvres et jaillissait de ses yeux. La citoyenne Saint-Jorre l’écoutait en silence et, prête à le croire, baissait les yeux.

Pour se familiariser avec les terribles fonctions dont il était investi, le nouveau juré voulut, mêlé au public, assister à un jugement du tribunal. Il gravit l’escalier où un peuple immense était assis comme dans un amphithéâtre et il pénétra dans l’ancienne salle du Parlement de Paris.

On s’étouffait pour voir juger quelque général. Car alors, comme disait le vieux Brotteaux, "la Convention, à l’exemple du gouvernement de Sa Majesté britannique, faisait passer en jugement les généraux vaincus, à défaut des généraux traîtres, qui, ceux-ci, ne se laissaient point juger. Ce n’est point, ajoutait Brotteaux, qu’un général vaincu soit nécessairement criminel, car de toute nécessité il en faut un dans chaque bataille. Mais il n’est rien comme de condamner à mort un général pour donner du cœur aux autres...."

English

Évariste Gamelin was to take up his duties on 14 September, when the Tribunal was reorganised into four divisions, with fifteen jurors in each. The prisons were overflowing; the public prosecutor worked eighteen hours a day. Against the defeats of the armies, the rebellions in the provinces, conspiracies, plots and betrayals, the Convention set terror. The gods were thirsty.

The new juror’s first step was to pay a visit of respect to President Herman, who charmed him with his gentle speech and agreeable manners. A fellow native of Robespierre’s province and his friend, sharing his sentiments, he revealed a sensitive and virtuous heart. He was deeply imbued with those humane feelings, so long alien to the hearts of judges, which are the everlasting glory of men such as Dupaty and Beccaria. He welcomed the softening of manners that had found expression in the courts through the abolition of torture and of degrading or cruel punishments. He rejoiced to see the death penalty, once used so lavishly and until recently still employed to punish the slightest offences, becoming rarer and reserved for serious crimes. Like Robespierre, he would willingly have abolished it himself in everything that did not concern public safety. But he would have thought himself a traitor to the State had he failed to punish crimes against national sovereignty with death.

All his colleagues thought as he did: the old monarchical idea of reasons of state inspired the Revolutionary Tribunal. Eight centuries of absolute power had formed its magistrates, and it judged the enemies of liberty according to the principles of divine right.

That same day Évariste Gamelin presented himself before the public prosecutor, Citizen Fouquier, who received him in the office where he worked with his clerk. He was a robust man, with a harsh voice and cat’s eyes; his broad, pockmarked face and leaden complexion bore the signs of the damage a sedentary, secluded existence inflicts on vigorous men made for the open air and strenuous exercise. Files rose about him like the walls of a tomb, and he clearly loved this terrible paperwork that seemed bent on smothering him. His conversation was that of a hardworking magistrate, attentive to his duties, whose mind never strayed beyond the bounds of his office. His hot breath smelt of the brandy he drank to keep himself going, and which seemed never to go to his head, so lucid were his unfailingly commonplace remarks.

He lived in a small apartment in the Palais with his young wife, who had borne him twins. This young woman, Aunt Henriette and the servant Pélagie made up his entire household. He was gentle and kind to these women. In short, he was an excellent man both at home and in his profession, with few ideas and no imagination.

Gamelin could not help noticing, with some displeasure, how closely these magistrates of the new order resembled those of the ancien régime in their minds and manners. And that was what they were: Herman had served as advocate-general to the Council of Artois; Fouquier had been an attorney at the Châtelet. Their characters had remained the same. But Évariste Gamelin believed in revolutionary rebirth.

Leaving the prosecutor’s offices, he crossed the gallery of the Palais and stopped before the shops where objects of every kind were artfully displayed. At Citizen Ténot’s stall he leafed through works of history, politics and philosophy: The Chains of Slavery; Essay on Despotism; The Crimes of Queens. “That’s more like it!” he thought. “These are republican writings!” He asked the bookseller whether she sold many such books. She shook her head.

“Nothing sells but songs and novels.”

Then, taking a small volume from a drawer, she added:

“Here’s something good.”

Évariste read the title: The Nun in Her Shift.

Outside the next shop he found Philippe Desmahis, magnificent and tender among Citizen Saint-Jorre’s scented waters, powders and sachets, assuring the pretty shopkeeper of his love, promising to paint her portrait and asking for a few moments’ conversation in the Tuileries gardens that evening. He was handsome. Persuasion flowed from his lips and flashed from his eyes. Citizen Saint-Jorre listened in silence and, on the point of believing him, lowered her gaze.

To familiarise himself with the terrible duties entrusted to him, the new juror decided to attend a trial among the public. He climbed the staircase, where an immense crowd sat as in an amphitheatre, and entered the former chamber of the Parlement of Paris.

People were being crushed in their eagerness to see some general tried. For at that time, as old Brotteaux used to say, “the Convention, following the example of His Britannic Majesty’s government, tried defeated generals for want of traitorous ones, who took good care not to stand trial. Not,” Brotteaux added, “that a defeated general is necessarily a criminal, since every battle must inevitably have one. But there’s nothing like sentencing a general to death to put heart into the others…”

About This Reading Edition

Anatole France’s The Gods Are Athirst follows the painter Évariste Gamelin as revolutionary conviction draws him into the work of the Revolutionary Tribunal. This complete French–English edition preserves the novel’s twenty-nine chapters, paired by source paragraph, with an introduction, historical orientation, glossary, and chapter notes.

Historical Text and Translation

The novel appeared in volume in 1912. The complete French reading text follows Project Gutenberg eBook 36477, whose underlying impression is undated and carries a later Brodard & Taupin colophon. Chapter I was also checked against a separate 1912 printing; that limited collation is distinguished from the source used for the whole novel.

About Diotimos Editions

The new English translation and editorial matter were generated and revised with AI for Diotimos Editions. The reader preserves the supplied paragraph pairing, songs, quoted letters, and 431 chapter notes, together with the source register and the edition’s statement of editorial responsibility.

Rights

Anatole France’s French source work is in the public domain. The new 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are credited as supplied in this bilingual edition.