DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Esotericism & Spirituality Collection · Parallel Edition

Thomas Vaughan

Magia Adamica

The Antiquity of Magic · With the Complete Coelum Terrae

Explore the Lexicon
Magia AdamicaContextual Lexicon · Part 1

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

English Introduction · Branch 308 of 318

Contextual Lexicon · Part 1

Modern English

Contextual Lexicon

These twenty-four entries connect exact sentences from the modern reading with literal forms in the historical text. Each separates the passage’s historical argument from a possible reflective application. Follow the passage links to read the qualifications and changes of voice in their setting.

The Desire to Know

“Before little children can speak, they stare at whatever is strange to them.” — unnumbered preliminary.

Source forms: Capacitie, Desire.

The reader’s address makes curiosity evidence of a capacity placed in humanity by its creator. Looking, touching and asking what a thing is precede play in Vaughan’s account. His example does more than recommend study: it supports his theological argument that a natural capacity would not have been given in vain. The ambitious claim that humanity can know everything belongs to that argument.

Reflective possibility: Curiosity can be examined before it becomes a demand for an immediate answer. A reader might ask whether a new encounter is being attended to, named too quickly, or treated only as entertainment. This application does not turn Vaughan’s observations into a modern developmental theory.

Read with the full passage, the related interpretive essay and the related contextual entry.

Shame and the Defence of Error

“Indeed, the feeling of disgrace prevails so far with some that they would rather persist in error and defend it against truth than acknowledge their weaknesses.” — unnumbered preliminary.

Source forms: Disgrace, Error.

Vaughan turns the philosopher’s blush into a problem for inquiry. A desire naturally directed towards knowledge can become the defence of one’s standing. His immediate target is the Peripatetic opponent who will not hear another account. The passage also supplies a standard by which readers can examine Vaughan’s own confident assertions and abusive polemic.

Reflective possibility: Correction may threaten an identity built around being knowledgeable. Separating the wish to understand from the wish to win makes room for a different response to a mistake. The sentence invites this examination without guaranteeing that a confident critic is therefore right.

Read with the full passage, the related interpretive essay and the related contextual entry.

The Fruits of Knowledge

“Look around you, then, and consider how you are surrounded by infinite treasures and miracles; yet you are so blind that you do not see them.” — unnumbered preliminary.

Source forms: Works, words.

The surrounding argument opposes knowledge whose fruit is action to knowledge reduced to academic conversation. Vaughan has first described material prosperity as dependent upon first matter and its distribution. Treasures therefore retain an economic and natural meaning as well as an imaginative force. The sentence cannot responsibly be detached from his strong claims about what the art can accomplish.

Reflective possibility: A possible reflective use is to ask what an account changes in observation or conduct. Recognising unnoticed resources can be valuable, but an attractive idea about hidden riches is not itself evidence that the promised result exists.

Read with the full passage, the related interpretive essay and the related contextual entry.

Truth and Its Reception

“As for the rest, since I cannot force their approval, I shall not beg for it.” — unnumbered preliminary.

Source forms: Approbation, worth.

The reader’s address ends by entrusting the book to its own worth and to a soul capable of understanding it. This independence follows a lengthy attack on an opponent and an allegory in which Truth occupies the rear of Lady Lie’s procession. It is an author’s claim about reception, not proof that neglected writing must be true.

Reflective possibility: One can distinguish dependence on applause from openness to correction. An inquiry need not succeed socially in order to deserve attention; equally, rejection does not establish its merit. The earlier discussion of shame makes that second qualification especially useful.

Read with the full passage, the related interpretive essay and the related contextual entry.

Wisdom Planted in the Creature

“Magic is simply the Creator’s wisdom revealed and planted in the creature.” — source p. 1.

Source forms: Wisdom, Creature.

The opening definition governs Vaughan’s defence of the word magic. He places it within creation and religion, then invokes the Magi who attended Christ. Later he distinguishes this art from conjuring and from the literal imitation of symbols. His definition is a contested seventeenth-century claim; the edition retains it without making it a definition of every historical practice called magic.

Reflective possibility: The image of wisdom planted in a creature can direct attention towards capacities received rather than invented. A symbolic reading can explore that relation while keeping visible Vaughan’s insistence that the same wisdom concerns the physical world.

Read with the full passage, the related interpretive essay and the related contextual entry.

The Seal of the Fathers

“Give him the authority of his fathers and he immediately submits to its seal.” — source p. 2.

Source forms: Authoritie, Seale.

About This Reading Edition

Thomas Vaughan’s complete 1650 Magia Adamica publication, with all historical preliminaries and the complete appended Coelum Terrae, original and modern English, fresh translations of Latin, Greek and Hebrew, full poems, eight historical marginal notes, the complete recovered printed corrections, 312 annotations and the complete supplied Diotimos study apparatus.

Historical Text and Translation

Thomas Vaughan (Eugenius Philalethes), Magia Adamica: or The Antiquitie of Magic, with Coelum Terrae. London: T. W. for H. Blunden, 1650. Governing transcription: EEBO-TCP A64768.0001.001. The Getty Research Institute copy supplies surviving first-edition page images; the 1656 issue supplies explicitly disclosed missing or defective material. The complete shared 1650 errata are recovered from the Bibliotheca Philosophica Hermetica copy of The Man-Mouse.

About Diotimos Editions

This historical edition credits Diotimos Editions as its English translator.

Rights

The historical text is public domain; the EEBO-TCP Phase I transcription is released under CC0. The supplied 2026 reading, translations and Diotimos editorial material are published with the site owner’s authorization.