Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Facing Pages · Branch 96 of 191
Book VI · Chapter 8 · §§ 1–4
Latin
p. 186Quinta ratio: corpus natura sua dispersum est.
Corpus natura sua dispersum est penitus. Primo, quia distantiam partium patitur, ita ut semper in alio loco sit alia. Secundo, quia continue transmutatur. Nam si subiicitur tempori, sicut varia momenta succedunt in tempore, sic affectiones momentis singulis variantur in corpore.
Quae quidem varietas cum fiat in caelis, multo magis fit raptu caelorum in elementis. Tertio, quia contrariis subiicitur qualitatibus, calori et frigori et similibus. Unde fit ut contra naturam corporis sit coire in unum, manere simile et sibi ipsi constare.
Extensio namque ipsa quantitatis partes corporis disiunctas manere compellit. Motus perennis cogit mutare naturam, neque sua simul habere, sed aliud amittere, quaerere aliud. Qualitatum contrarietas impellit ut altera fugiat alteram; per quam fugam corpus ipsum compositum dissipatur.
Quamvis autem per haec appareat corpus natura sua nullo modo posse firmiter in unitate consistere, tamen corpus quodlibet aliquo modo in suis partibus nectitur, cunctis in unam totius corporis copulam conspirantibus. Est igitur in corpore aliquid ultra corporis naturam quod ipsum unit, sistit et continet. Unit, inquam, distantiam partium. Sistit fluxum perennem.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VI
p. 187Fifth argument: a body is by nature dispersed.
Body is by its nature thoroughly dispersed. First, because it admits distance between its parts, so that one is always in one place and another elsewhere. Second, because it is continually transformed. For if it is subject to time, then just as successive moments follow one another in time, so its conditions change at every moment.
This variation occurs even in the heavens, and much more in the elements under the sweep of the heavens. Third, because body is subject to contrary qualities, heat and cold and the like. Thus it is contrary to the nature of body to gather into one, to remain like itself, and to remain consistent with itself.
For the very extension of quantity compels the parts of body to remain disjoined. Perpetual motion compels body to change its nature and not to possess all that is its own at once, but to lose one thing and seek another. The contrariety of qualities drives one to flee the other; through this flight the composite body itself is scattered.
Although these considerations show that by its nature body cannot in any way stand firmly in unity, nevertheless every body is somehow bound together in its parts, all of them conspiring in the single bond of the whole body. There is therefore in body something beyond the nature of body that unites it, holds it firm, and contains it. It unites, I say, parts standing at a distance. It arrests their perpetual flux.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book VI · VI.8.1–VI.8.4
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive