DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II

Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IIBook VI · Chapter 2 · §§ 23–24

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Latin Page · Branch 84 of 191

Book VI · Chapter 2 · §§ 23–24

Latin

p. 162

Ita lumen esse negabitis in sphaera ignis, quoniam oculis non prospicitur. Sed et ipse solis fulgor, etiam si non videretur, existeret, quandoquidem existit nunc et non videtur a noctuis; atque ipsius splendor aliquis mixtus vaporibus potius quam ipse videtur a nobis, sed ipsum esse alicubi ex hoc eius splendore coniicimus. Sic etiam inesse lumen caelestibus animis spiritale ex ipso siderum lumine, quod illius imago est, coniectamur. An nescitis lucis actum nihil esse aliud quam lucere, ac tanto clarius rutilare quanto longius a crassis corporibus separatur? Secernite ipsam ab omni materia: mirabilius rutilabit, et vivet quidem tunc maxime, si quando victura sit. Ubi enim crescit actus, augetur et vita, praesertim cum per eius calorem haec omnia vivant. Sentiet quoque, ut ita dixerim, quando per eius radios haec omnia sentiunt; ipsa tamen minime sentietur. Nam et tenuitate subterfugiet aciem oculorum et ubertate fulgoris intelligibilis superabit terreni visus capacitatem.

Scitis in sphaeris elementorum ignem infimum usque adeo ad naturam supremi aeris declinare, aerem vero contra supremum ita ad ignem illum attolli, ut et ignis ille nihil ferme aliud videatur esse quam tenuis aer, et aer ille crassior ignis; adeo ut quicumque aerem illum cernit vidisse se ignem possit absque mendacio affirmare. Eadem comparatio est mentis infimae, qualis est anima rationalis, ad sublime corpus, quod est caelum. Ergo et anima quodammodo est tenue caelum, et caelum est crassior anima. Et qui caelum suspicit prospicit animam.

162

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VI

p. 163

In the same way, you will deny that light exists in the sphere of fire because it is not discerned by the eyes. But the sun's own radiance would exist even if it were not seen, since it exists now and is not seen by owls. What we see is a certain splendor of it mixed with vapors rather than the radiance itself; yet from this splendor we infer that the radiance itself exists somewhere. So too, from the light of the stars, which is its image, we infer that spiritual light inheres in celestial souls. Do you not know that the activity of light is nothing other than to shine, and that it glows more clearly the farther it is separated from dense bodies? Separate it from all matter: it will shine more wonderfully, and then it will live most of all, if it is ever to live. For where activity increases, life also increases, especially since all these things live through its heat. It will also sense, so to speak, since through its rays all these things sense; yet it will not itself be sensed. By its subtlety it will elude the sharpness of the eyes, and by the abundance of its intelligible radiance it will surpass the capacity of earthly sight.

You know that among the elemental spheres the lowest fire descends so far toward the nature of the highest air, while the highest air in turn rises so far toward that fire, that the fire appears to be scarcely anything other than subtle air, and the air a denser fire. Thus anyone who sees that air can affirm without falsehood that he has seen fire. The same comparison holds between the lowest mind, such as the rational soul, and the sublime body which is heaven. The soul is therefore in a certain way a subtle heaven, and heaven a denser soul. Whoever looks up at heaven looks forth upon the soul.

163

About This Reading Edition

Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.