DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II

Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IIBook VI · Chapter 2 · § 2

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Facing Pages · Branch 71 of 191

Book VI · Chapter 2 · § 2

Latin

p. 136

Si potentiam illam naturalem quid anima sit interroges, corpus esse procul dubio respondebit. Ea siquidem vis nihil attingit aliud nisi corpus. Si sensum exteriorem rogaveris, corpus similiter respondebit. Oculi figuram quandam et colorem animae ascribent; aures vocem; olfactus odorem; saporem gustus; pondus soliditatemque et calorem et similia tactus. Quod si sensum interiorem, qui reliquiis externorum sensuum pascitur, de anima fueris percontatus, ipse quoque animam corporum pinget simulachris. Nihil enim habet aliud quod adhibeat. Infelix adolescentia nostra sub indoctis praeceptoribus his nutrita cogit nos per omnem aetatem stulte sentire de anima, dum eam opinamur esse corpoream, ab his docti magistris qui sola sentiunt corporalia. Maxime vero hic error inde videtur exortus, immo vero potius confirmatus: quod, si quando tribus his praeceptoribus tamquam sophistis omnino dimissis ad mentem illam sapientiae magistram confugimus et ab ea quid sit anima sciscitamur, illa talem esse respondet qualem et ipsa videt. Illa vero, heu, qualem videt! Quam foedam! Quam miserabilem! Profecto non talem qualis olim caelo descenderat, sed potentiam illam animae naturalem, corporis fabricatricem, cernit quattuor humorum, in quibus ipsa mergitur, tabe pollutam et membrorum pinguedine suffocatam. Sensus quoque externos inspicit undique declinantes ad corpora, agentes per corpus, a corporibus quodammodo patientes. Sensum etiam interiorem, quem nominant phantasiam, variis diversorum corporum figuris et qualitatibus quasi per sensus haustis cernit opertum. Dum igitur animam corporali veste aspicit involutam et appetitum eius proclivem esse ad corpora animadvertit, certe respondet eam esse corpoream, non aliter ac si puer aliquis statim natus luto oblitus ita fuisset, ut undique per omnem pueritiam lutea testa esset obductus, ac postea rogaretur: ‘Quale tuum est, o puer, corpusculum?’ Nonne esse luteum responderet? Ablue, puer, corpus; absterge carnes a glebis. Carneum te videbis, non luteum.

136

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VI

p. 137

If you ask the natural power what the soul is, it will answer without hesitation that the soul is a body, for that power touches nothing but body. If you ask outward sense, it will give the same answer. The eyes will ascribe a shape and color to the soul; the ears a voice; smell an odor; taste a flavor; and touch weight, solidity, heat, and qualities of that kind. If you question inward sense, which feeds upon the vestiges left by the outward senses, it too will paint the soul with images of bodies, for it has nothing else at hand. Our unhappy youth, nourished under these ignorant teachers, compels us to think foolishly about the soul throughout our lives. We suppose it corporeal because we learned from masters who perceive only corporeal things. This error seems especially to have arisen—or rather, to have been confirmed—in another way. If we ever dismiss these three teachers altogether as sophists and take refuge in the mind, that mistress of wisdom, asking it what the soul is, it answers that the soul is such as the mind itself sees it. But alas, what does the mind see? How foul a soul, how pitiable! Certainly not the soul as it was when it descended from heaven. The mind sees the soul's natural power, the fashioner of the body, stained by the corruption of the four humors in which it is submerged and smothered by the fat of the members. It sees the outward senses bending everywhere toward bodies, acting through the body and in some fashion being acted upon by bodies. It sees also the inward sense they call imagination, covered with the forms and qualities of diverse bodies, as though these had been drawn in through the senses. Thus, when the mind beholds the soul wrapped in a bodily garment and observes its appetite inclining toward bodies, it naturally answers that the soul is corporeal. It is just as if a boy had been smeared with mud at birth and encased on every side in an earthen crust throughout his childhood. If someone later asked him, ‘What is your little body like, child?’ would he not answer that it was made of clay? Wash the body, child; clear the clods from your flesh. You will see that you are flesh, not clay.

137

About This Reading Edition

Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.