Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 70 of 191
Book VI · Chapter 2 · § 1
Latin
p. 134Plebei philosophi non ratione aliqua persuasi, sed prava decepti consuetudine corporalem animam posuerunt.
Principio plebeos philosophos, qui corporalem esse animam arbitrantes opinionem ex illis quattuor aliquam secuti sunt, non ratione aliqua persuasos, sed longa quadam et infelicissima consuetudine in hanc sententiam compulsos existimo. Tria potissimum animae nostrae officia esse videntur. Siquidem agit in corpore, agit per corpus, operatur etiam per se ipsam. In corpore agit per eam potentiam quam vegetatricem vocant Peripatetici, Platonici vero nostri naturam, quando generat corpus, nutritque et auget. Per corpus agit secundum sensum tum exteriorem, quando videt, audit, olfacit, gustat et tangit; tum interiorem, quando eorum corporum quae sensit extrinsecus imagines, quasi reliquias sensuum, secum ipsa revolvit. Per se ipsam agit quando neque corpora per sensus exteriores attingit neque imagines corporum per interiorem sensum recolligit, sed ipsa mera vis animae incorporeaque incorporeum aliquid investigat et invenit, quod neque corpus sit neque corporis alicuius imago. Quam quidem actionem intelligentiam nominamus. Habes igitur actionem naturalem, sensum, intelligentiam. Actione naturali utitur anima in ipso fetu, statim corpus ingressa; sensu paulo post, homine videlicet statim nato; intelligentia pura vix tandem adulto iam corpore. Magna vero pars hominum fere numquam, illi praesertim qui etiam trigesimo aetatis anno sunt pueri.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VI
p. 135Philosophers of the common sort, persuaded by no argument but misled by corrupt habit, held that the soul was corporeal.
To begin, I believe that the common philosophers who judged the soul to be corporeal and adopted one of the first four positions were persuaded by no argument. A long and most unhappy habit drove them to this opinion. The soul appears to have three principal offices: it acts within the body, it acts through the body, and it also operates through itself. It acts within the body by the power which the Peripatetics call vegetative and our Platonists call nature, when it generates the body, nourishes it, and makes it grow. It acts through the body by outward sense when it sees, hears, smells, tastes, and touches, and by inward sense when it turns over within itself the images of bodies perceived outside, like vestiges left by the senses. It acts through itself when it neither reaches bodies by the outward senses nor gathers bodily images by the inward sense, but, as the soul's bare and incorporeal power, investigates and discovers something incorporeal, which is neither a body nor an image of any body. We call this activity understanding. Thus you have natural activity, sensation, and understanding. The soul employs natural activity in the fetus as soon as it has entered the body; sensation a little later, as soon as the human being is born; and pure understanding scarcely even when the body has at last become adult. Indeed, a great part of humanity scarcely ever employs it, especially those who are still children in their thirtieth year.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book VI · VI.2.1
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive