Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Facing Pages · Branch 63 of 191
Book V · Chapter 15 · §§ 23–24
Latin
p. 120An quia invitos nos plerumque opprimit somnus, metuendum est ne quo tali defectu animus convertatur in corpus? Quasi vero, quoniam somno membra nostra marcescunt, idcirco animus fiat ex parte ulla debilior. Sensibilia tamen non sentit, quia quicquid illud est quod somnum facit e corpore est atque in corpore operatur. Corporeos enim sensus sopit et claudit quodammodo, ita tamen ut tali commutationi corporis cedat anima cum voluntate, quia secundum naturam est talis commutatio quae reficit corpus a laboribus.
Non tamen haec adimit animo vel sentiendi vim vel intelligendi. Nam et imagines sensibilium praesto habet tanta expressione similitudinis ut eo ipso tempore discerni nequeant ab iis rebus quarum imagines sunt. Et si quid intelligit, aeque dormienti ac vigilanti verum est. Nam, verbi gratia, si per somnum disputare sibi visus fuerit verasque rationes secutus in disputando didicerit aliquid, etiam expergefacto eadem incommutabilia manent, quamvis falsa reperiantur cetera, veluti locus ubi disputatio et persona cum qua disputatio fuisse visa erat et verba ipsa quae ad somnum attinent quibus disputari videbatur et alia huiuscemodi quae ipsis sensibus sentiuntur agunturque a vigilantibus; praetereunt tamen, nec ulla ex parte sempiternam praesentiam verarum rationum assequuntur. Ex quo colligitur tali commutatione corporis quae somnus est non vim ipsius animae sed vitam corporis posse minui.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book V
p. 121Because sleep often overcomes us against our will, must we fear that some comparable failure could convert the mind into body? That would be as though, because our limbs grow slack in sleep, the mind itself became weaker in some part. It does not, to be sure, perceive sensible things while asleep, because whatever causes sleep comes from the body and operates in the body. It lulls and in a sense closes the bodily senses. Yet the soul yields willingly to this bodily change, since the change accords with nature and restores the body after its labors.
Sleep does not, however, take from the mind either its power of sensing or its power of understanding. It has images of sensible things immediately present with so vivid a likeness that at the time they cannot be distinguished from the things whose images they are. And whatever it understands is no less true for the sleeper than for one awake. Suppose, for example, that someone dreams he is conducting an argument and, by following true principles, learns something in the course of it. On waking, those same immutable truths remain, although everything else proves false: the place where the argument seemed to occur, the person with whom it seemed to be conducted, the very words belonging to the dream through which the argument seemed to proceed, and other things of this sort. Such things are perceived by the senses and enacted by waking people, yet they pass away and in no respect attain the everlasting presence of true principles. From this we conclude that the bodily change called sleep can diminish not the power of the soul itself but only the life of the body.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book V · V.15.23–V.15.24
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive