DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II

Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IIBook V · Chapter 10 · § 2

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

English Page · Branch 31 of 191

Book V · Chapter 10 · § 2

Latin

p. 56

Corporales vero formae quales? Certe similes. Forma enim corporibus insita excellentiam quidem amisit suam et corporalis prorsus evasit, siquidem omnes condiciones corporis iam subiit. Condiciones corporis duae sunt: secundum locum extensio et secundum tempus mutatio. Forma vero immersa corporibus cum latitudine corporis dilatatur et mutatur corpore permutato. Quoniam igitur facta est penitus corporalis, pristina excellentia destituta, per se quidem minime est, ut diximus alias, et esse nullum habet proprium; sed ita cum materia copulatur ut unum sit esse totius. Si ergo per se non est, per se certe non agit. Ideo si referatur ad primam causam, per aliud aliquid referetur: per illud videlicet per quod est. Est autem per formam aliam sublimiorem, a materia liberam, a qua etiam pendet in materiam continue, quemadmodum a vultu hominis imago in speculum, per quam ad primam causam assidue quoque refertur. Si omnino per aliud est forma corporea, cum etiam ad primum principium per aliud referatur, quidnam est illud per quod tam corpus naturale quam eius forma refertur ad primum? Sane est essentia illa tertia quam supra corporum qualitates iam pridem locavimus. Essentia vero huiusmodi eodem modo ad Deum refert corporum qualitates quo eas efficit in materia. Efficit autem operatione sua. Operatio sua est mobilis. Per agitationem igitur generat; per agitationem et refert. Itaque refert mutabiliter. Hinc sequitur ut naturalia corpora eorumque formae, quia per aliud perque motum referuntur in Deum, neque per se sint neque stabilia, sed vacillent prorsus et pereant.

56

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book V

p. 57

What, then, of corporeal forms? They are certainly similar to bodies in this respect. A form implanted in bodies has lost its own excellence and become wholly corporeal, since it has now undergone every condition of body. The conditions of body are two: extension with respect to place and change with respect to time. A form immersed in bodies is extended together with the breadth of the body and changes when the body is altered. Since it has thus become thoroughly corporeal and has been deprived of its former excellence, it does not exist in its own right, as we have said elsewhere, and has no being of its own. Rather, it is so joined with matter that there is one being of the whole. If it does not exist through itself, it certainly does not act through itself. Hence, if it is related to the first cause, it must be related through something else—namely, through that by which it exists. It exists through another, higher form, free from matter, from which it continually hangs down into matter as an image in a mirror depends upon a man's face; through this higher form it is also constantly related to the first cause. If a corporeal form exists altogether through another and is likewise related to the first principle through another, what is that through which both the natural body and its form are related to the first? It is assuredly that third essence which we long ago placed above the qualities of bodies. This essence relates bodily qualities to God in the same way that it produces them in matter. It produces them by its operation, and its operation is mobile. Through motion, therefore, it generates them, and through motion it also relates them. Thus its mode of relating them is mutable. It follows that natural bodies and their forms, because they are related to God through another and through motion, neither exist through themselves nor remain stable, but waver utterly and perish.

57

About This Reading Edition

Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.