Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Facing Pages · Branch 29 of 191
Book V · Chapter 9 · § 4
Latin
p. 52Quin etiam si idem prorsus exsisteret esse atque calere, quando ita componis, Ignis quia per se calet, calet semper, adderes protinus, Calere et esse idem est; ergo est et semper. Nunc autem non potes eo modo concludere, quia non idem est esse atque calere. Alioquin quaecumque sunt calerent, et quicquid calere desinit desineret esse, quod non accidit. Itaque ignis semper dum est calet, quia prius quodammodo est et postea calet. Et quia esse est ante calere et aliud quam calere, ideo per aliquod medium videtur calor essentiae ignis inesse, ita ut primo ponatur ignis essentia, secundo eius esse, tertio loco calere. Immo vero essentia ignis sortitur esse per id quod haeret materiae. Prius enim quodammodo latet in materiae sinu quam edatur in lucem. Et sicut latuit antequam exsisteret, sic etiam haeret postea ut non cesset exsistere. Sortitur quoque calere per id quod possidet esse. Quapropter calere desinit quando desinit esse; desinit esse quando desinit inhaerere. Sed animae essentia, quoniam est forma soluta, esse sortitur per semet ipsam. Et in ea ipsum esse est primus et proprius actus essentiae; nec ullum vinculum est per quod esse cum essentia connectatur, quo soluto accidat dissolutio. Ac licet tam calere quam esse per aliquam condicionem conveniat ignis essentiae, animae tamen essentiae non convenit esse per condicionem ullam, sed absolute. Idcirco licet ignis cum certa quadam condicione sit et caleat semper, anima tamen semper est absolute.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book V
p. 53Indeed, if being and being hot were altogether the same, then when you frame the premise, ‘Because fire is hot in its own right, it is always hot,’ you would immediately add, ‘Being hot and being are the same; therefore it exists, and exists always.’ But you cannot draw that conclusion, because being and being hot are not the same. Otherwise everything that exists would be hot, and whatever ceased to be hot would cease to exist, which does not happen. Fire is therefore always hot while it exists, because in a certain sense it first exists and afterward is hot. Since being comes before being hot and is other than it, heat seems to inhere in the essence of fire through some intermediary: first the essence of fire is posited, second its being, and in the third place its being hot. Indeed, the essence of fire obtains being through adhering to matter. In a certain sense it lies hidden in the womb of matter before it is brought forth into the light; and just as it lay hidden before it existed, so afterward it continues to adhere, lest it cease to exist. It also obtains being hot through possessing being. Hence it ceases to be hot when it ceases to be, and ceases to be when it ceases to inhere. But because the soul's essence is a separate form, it obtains being through itself. In the soul, being itself is the first and proper act of essence. There is no bond by which being is connected with essence and whose loosening could bring dissolution. Although both being hot and being belong to the essence of fire under some condition, being belongs to the soul's essence under no condition at all, but absolutely. Thus, although fire exists under a determinate condition and is always hot, the soul exists always without qualification.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book V · V.9.4
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive