Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Page · Branch 20 of 191
Book V · Chapter 7 · § 1
Latin
p. 34Septima ratio: quia esse suum habet in sua essentia.
Aliud essentiam vocamus, aliud esse. Essentiam quidem dicimus rationem rei quae definitione comprehenditur. Esse vero actum ipsius essentiae et quandam eius in rerum natura praesentiam. Exemplum accipe de crinita. Essentia crinitae est ratio haec ipsius et definitio, utputa vapor siccus in aere summo accensus ab igni, perque aerem ordine circumiens. Quae quidem definitio hodie vera est, etsi nusquam hodie crinita effulgeat. Esse vero crinitae huiusmodi quiddam dicitur, ut videlicet talis illa natura crinitae, quae per definitionem quotidie designatur, iam nunc alicubi luceat. Esse hoc absque certo loco et tempore non fit. Non aliter enim fit illa essentia praesens quam hic vel ibi, hac hora vel illa. Igitur esse naturalium rerum certo loco eget et tempore; essentia iis non indiget. Vera enim est crinitae ratio illa, etsi ad praesens crinita nusquam caleat. Immo si definitio illa certum includeret tempus et locum, puta hodie hic aut cras ibi, in eadem utique hora eademque aeris plaga in qua una crinita exsistit, cunctae simul essent crinitae. In singulis enim crinitis inest communis crinitae essentia et ratio eadem. Quod si ratio haec certo sit loco temporique adstricta, ad eosdem terminos loci et temporis crinitae omnes adstringerentur, quemadmodum rationalis potentia, cum in definitione hominis includatur, singulis hominibus convenit. Essentia itaque et esse naturalium rerum hoc inter se differunt, quod esse certo loco temporique adstringitur; essentia vero quantum in se est ad omne tempus ferme omnemque locum aeque se habet. Siquidem humanitas ipsa non minus saeculis aliis quam nostris aut in oriente minus quam occidente potest consistere. Plato vero et Socrates, hoc aut illo ut sint et vivant, loco egent et tempore. In ipsa humanitate essentia designatur; in singulis istis hominibus esse conspicitur. Igitur essentia a singulis temporis et loci limitibus est exclusa. Quapropter ad sui conservationem per sui naturam nullo indiget loco, neque terminos habet temporis quibus aliquando excedatur, quandoquidem ab huiusmodi terminis est exempta. Ubique ergo viget et semper. Essentia igitur omnis secundum se ipsam dicitur immortalis. Talis autem est per naturam suam formae cuiusque essentia.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book V
p. 35Seventh argument: because it has its being in its own essence.
We call one thing essence and another being. By essence we mean the account of a thing that is comprehended in its definition. Being, however, is the act of that essence and a certain presence of it in the natural world. Take the example of a comet. The essence of a comet is its account and definition: a dry vapor in the upper air, kindled by fire and circling through the air in an ordered course. This definition is true today even if no comet shines anywhere today. But for a comet of this kind to have being means that the cometary nature which the definition designates day after day is now actually shining somewhere. Such being cannot occur without a determinate place and time, for the essence becomes present only here or there, at this hour or that. Thus the being of natural things requires a determinate place and time; their essence does not. The account of the comet remains true even if no comet is now aflame anywhere. Indeed, if its definition included a determinate time and place—say, here today or there tomorrow—then all comets would have to exist together in the same hour and the same region of the sky in which one comet exists. For in every comet there is the common essence of a comet and the same account. If that account were bound to a determinate place and time, all comets would be bound to the same limits of place and time, just as rational capacity, because it is included in the definition of man, belongs to every man. Essence and being in natural things therefore differ in this: being is bound to a determinate place and time, whereas essence, so far as lies in itself, is equally disposed toward almost every time and every place. Humanity itself can subsist no less in other ages than in ours, and no less in the East than in the West. Plato and Socrates, however, need this place or that and this time or that in order to be and to live. Essence is denoted in humanity itself; being is discerned in these individual men. Essence is therefore excluded from every particular limit of time and place. By its own nature it needs no place in order to be preserved, nor does it have temporal bounds that may one day be overstepped, since it is exempt from bounds of that kind. It flourishes, therefore, everywhere and always. Every essence, considered in itself, is thus called immortal; and such by its nature is the essence of every form.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book V · V.7.1
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive