Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Page · Branch 141 of 191
Book VII · Chapter 13 · § 1
Latin
p. 276Decimatertia ratio. Harmonia humorum nihil capit absque materia.
Quicquid aliquid efficit, eo quod ab ipso fit esse debet praestantius. Quo quid a materia liberius est, eo est et sublimius. Quare semper debet causa esse a materia liberior quam effectus. Nullus itaque effectus potest esse a materia quam causa sua liberior. Vis nutriendi a materia admodum libera est, quae plurima et super et praeter ordinem elementorum operari demonstrata est alias. Vis sentiendi etiam magis est a materia libera, quia in ipso suo sentiendi actu formas rerum accipit absque rerum ipsarum materia. Non enim visus colorem parietis cum pariete simul accipit, sed coloris attingit imaginem spiritalem. Multo magis intelligentia idem facit, ut in sequentibus apparebit. Quoniam igitur hae vires animi multum sunt a materia liberae, nequeunt ab ea causa proficisci quae sit materia vel immersa materiae. Humores omnino corporales sunt. Quamobrem nullo modo humores possunt sua quadam mixtione vel consonantia vires huiusmodi procreare, multo minus animam ipsam virium huiusmodi fontem. Quippe si anima in humorum qualitatibus substantiam habeat, quicquid capiet per humorum affectiones suscipiet. Per eas vero formae solum corporales suscipiuntur. Siquidem per caliditatem siccitatemque non ignis imaginem spiritalem accipiet, sed ignis substantiam corporalem. Rursus per frigus siccumque ipsam accipiet terram. Ipsa quoque terra, quoniam similiter accipiet atque anima, similiter sentiet. Idem faciet lapis et reliqua.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VII
p. 277Thirteenth argument. A harmony of the humors receives nothing apart from matter.
Whatever produces something must be more excellent than what is produced by it. The freer anything is from matter, the more sublime it is. A cause, therefore, must always be freer from matter than its effect. No effect, then, can be freer from matter than its own cause. The nutritive power is very free from matter, for we have shown elsewhere that it performs many things both above and beyond the order of the elements. The power of sensation is still freer from matter, because in the very act of sensing it receives the forms of things without the matter of those things. Sight does not receive the color of a wall together with the wall itself, but touches a spiritual image of its color. Understanding does the same to a much greater degree, as will appear in what follows. Since, therefore, these powers of the soul enjoy great freedom from matter, they cannot proceed from a cause that is itself matter or immersed in matter. The humors are wholly corporeal. They therefore cannot in any way produce powers of this kind through some mixture or concord of their own, much less the soul itself, the source of powers of this kind. For if the soul has its substance in the qualities of the humors, whatever it receives it will receive through the affections of the humors. Through these, however, only bodily forms are received. Through heat and dryness it will receive not a spiritual image of fire but the bodily substance of fire; in turn, through cold and dryness it will receive earth itself. Earth itself, since it receives in the same manner as the soul, will also sense in the same manner. A stone and all the rest will do the same.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book VII · VII.13.1
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive