Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 133 of 191
Book VII · Chapter 6 · § 3
Latin
p. 260Quapropter veniendum denique est ad iudicem quendam liberum passione. Hic, dum iudicat corporis passiones, si accipit inde qualitatem aliquam corporalem, procul dubio patitur. Si non accipit, non formatur a corpore. Sit ergo oportet talis iudex ut neque passiones accipiat a corporibus neque formas. Non posset autem anima talis esse si ipsa vel corpus esset tenuissimum in hoc corpore mersum vel aliqua corporis huius affectio sive punctum quoddam affectionis. Platonica haec ita Augustinus Plotinusque comprobant. Videtur mihi anima, cum sentit in corpore, non ab illo aliquid pati, sed in eius passionibus attentius agere. Et has actiones, sive faciles propter convenientiam sive difficiles propter inconvenientiam, non eam latere. Et hoc totum est quod sentire dicitur. Sed iste sensus, qui etiam dum nihil sentitur inest tamen, quasi per instrumentum est corporale, quod ea temperatione agitur ab anima ut in eo sit ad passiones corporis cum attentione agendas paratior, similia similibus ut adiungat repellatque quod noxium est. Agit porro, ut opinor, luminosum aliquid in oculis, aereum serenissimum et mobilissimum in auribus, caliginosum in naribus, in ore humidum, in tactu terreum et quasi lutulentum. Agit autem haec omnia cum quiete, si illa quae sunt in animali in unitate valitudinis familiari quadam consensione cohaeserint. Cum autem adhibentur ea quae nonnulla, ut ita dicam, alteritate corpus afficiunt, agit attentiores actiones suis quibusdam locis aut instrumentis accommodatas, et tunc sentire dicitur. Quibus actionibus congrua libenter associat et moleste obsistit incongruis. Has operationes passionibus corporis puto animam exhibere cum sentit, non easdem passiones recipere. Cum aereus auris spiritus verberatur sono, anima quae ante percussionem huiusmodi in silentio corpus aurium vegetabat vegetat tunc attentius. Idque facere est non pati. Attentior operatio non latet animam operantem. Non latere sentire est. Summatim, sensus est aut animadversio operationis illius attentioris aut iudicium corporeae passionis et qualitatis excitatum ab attentiore illa animae actione.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VII
p. 261We must therefore arrive at last at a judge free from affection. While this judge passes judgment on the body's affections, if it receives from them some bodily quality, it is without doubt acted upon; if it receives no such quality, it is not formed by the body. The judge must therefore be of such a kind that it receives neither affections nor forms from bodies. The soul could not be such a judge if it were itself either an exceedingly subtle body submerged in this body, or some affection of this body, or a point belonging to such an affection. Augustine and Plotinus confirm these Platonic conclusions. It seems to me that when the soul senses within the body, it does not undergo anything from the body but acts with greater attention amid the body's affections. These activities—easy when there is agreement, difficult when there is disagreement—do not escape the soul; and this is the whole of what we call sensing. Yet this sensory capacity, which remains present even when nothing is being sensed, exists through something like a bodily instrument. The soul gives that instrument such a temperament that the sensory power within it is readier to act attentively upon the body's affections, so that it may join like things to like and repel what is harmful. The soul activates, as I suppose, something luminous in the eyes; in the ears, something airy, utterly clear and mobile; in the nostrils, something misty; in the mouth, something moist; and in touch, something earthy and, as it were, muddy. It activates all these quietly so long as the things within the living creature cohere in the unity of health through a certain harmonious consent. But when things are applied that affect the body with a certain otherness, so to speak, the soul performs more attentive activities, fitted to their particular places or instruments, and is then said to sense. Through these activities it gladly associates what is congenial and painfully resists what is uncongenial. When the soul senses, I believe it displays these activities in response to the body's affections; it does not receive those same affections. When the airy spirit of the ear is struck by sound, the soul—which before such an impact animated the bodily organ of hearing in silence—animates that organ with greater attention. To do this is to act, not to be acted upon. The soul that performs the more attentive activity is aware of it, and to be aware of it is to sense. In sum, sensation is either awareness of that more attentive activity or a judgment of bodily affection and quality awakened by the soul's more attentive action.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book VII · VII.6.3
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive