Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 132 of 191
Book VII · Chapter 6 · § 2
Latin
p. 258Complectere paucis. Tam in carne quam in spiritu perniciosa quaedam fit substantiaeque corruptrix solutio vel contractio; hanc vocemus noxiam laesionem. Numquid etiam in animam laesio transit huiusmodi? Minime. Haec enim substantiam perdit; perdit igitur substantiae ipsius virtutem, perdit deinceps virtutis operationem. In qualibet igitur carnis et spiritus vel levissima laesione animae substantia illis praesens similiter laederetur; laederetur et virtus multo magis; laederetur et operatio. Sensus et phantasia vires animae sunt; sentire et iudicare per sensum harum virium actiones. Ergo, si discissio illa in animae substantiam pertransiret, neque sentiremus eam neque qualis sit et unde et quomodo succurrendum iudicaremus, sed vel lateret animam penitus vel minimum quid perciperetur et falso iudicaretur ab anima. Et cum anima sit ubique tota, si ipsa in parte corporis secta patitur, tota patitur. Eadem vero tota anima quae ibi est est et per totum corpus. Per totum igitur corpus patitur. Si ubique patitur, non potest percipere et nuntiare passionem illam in parte una animalis magis quam in alia esse. Quin etiam, cum aliud sit passio, aliud iudicium passionis, et passio semper iudicetur ab alio, si in ipso iudicio insit passio, opus est ulterius alio quodam iudicio quo passivum iudicium iudicetur. Si illud quoque sit passivum, rursus opus est alio.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VII
p. 259Sum up the matter briefly. In both flesh and spirit there occurs a destructive loosening or contraction that corrupts their substance; let us call this a harmful injury. Does an injury of this kind also pass into the soul? By no means. Such an injury destroys substance; it therefore destroys the power belonging to that substance, and thereafter the power's operation. Consequently, in even the slightest injury to flesh or spirit, if the injury passed into the soul, the soul's substance present to them would likewise be injured; its power would be injured still more, and its operation as well. Sensation and imagination are powers of the soul; sensing and judging through sensation are the activities of those powers. If, then, the cut passed into the soul's substance, we should neither sense it nor judge what kind of injury it is, where it comes from, and how aid should be given. Either it would remain wholly hidden from the soul, or at most something slight would be perceived, and the soul would judge it falsely. Moreover, since the soul is whole everywhere, if the soul itself suffers where one part of the body is cut, the whole soul suffers. But the same whole soul that is there also extends through the entire body; it therefore suffers throughout the entire body. If it suffers everywhere, it cannot perceive and report that the affection is present in one part of the living creature more than in another. Moreover, the affection is one thing and the judgment of it another, and an affection is always judged by something else. If an affection inheres in the judgment itself, a further judgment is needed to judge that affected judgment. If this second judgment too is affected, yet another is again required.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book VII · VII.6.2
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive