Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 128 of 191
Book VII · Chapter 5 · § 2
Latin
p. 250Formae autem sparsae per corpus, puta albedini, idem in hoc accidit quod et corpori, ut videlicet passio unius partis non necessario reliquas partes omnes commutet. Quid enim prohibet unam corporis albedinisque partem infici et foedari, reliquis non pollutis? Ceterum nihil in una quavis particula animalis accidit quin id ad totam mox pertineat animam. Mysterium hoc Platonicum Augustinus noster ita confirmat. Anima per totum corpus quod animat non locali diffusione, sed quadam vitali intensione porrigitur. Nam per omnes particulas tota simul adest, nec minor in minoribus, nec in maioribus maior, sed alicubi intensius, alicubi remissius; et in omnibus tota et in singulis tota est. Neque enim aliter quicquid in corpore etiam non in toto sentit, tamen tota sentit. Nam cum exiguo puncto in carne unum aliquid tangitur, quamvis locus ille non solum totius corporis non sit, sed vix in corpore videatur, animam tamen totam non latet. Neque id quod sentitur per corporis cuncta discurrit, sed ibi tantum sentitur ubi fit. Unde ergo ad totam mox pervenit quod non in toto fit? Nec ut tota ibi sit, cetera deserit. Vivunt etenim illa ea praesente ubi nihil tale factum est. Quod si fieret utrumque simul, utrumque totam pariter non lateret. Haec Aurelius. Verum dices fortasse animam quidem ita per universum corpus porrectam ut pars eius in pede sit, pars in crure, alia in femore, pectore, collo, summa in cerebro, ubi fiat iudicium principale; ac dolorem pedis non ideo iudicari a vi animae quae sedet in cerebro quia illa vis adsit et pedi, sed quoniam successione quadam altera pars animae alteri ad cerebrum usque passionem pedis enuntiat. Profecto non negabis partes istas animae inferiores sentire, cum evidenter appareat in membris illis percipi passionem. Si enim pedis passio sit cerebro nuntianda, vel ex eo nuntiatur quod gradatim membra intermedia patiuntur, vel ex eo quod, licet non patiantur, sentiunt tamen dolorem pedis eumque cerebro referunt.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VII
p. 251A form spread through a body—whiteness, for example—undergoes what the body itself undergoes in this respect: an affection of one part does not necessarily alter all the other parts. What prevents one part of the body and its whiteness from being stained and disfigured while the rest remains unpolluted? Yet nothing happens in any particle of a living creature without at once concerning the whole soul. Our Augustine confirms this Platonic mystery as follows. The soul extends through the whole body it animates, not by a diffusion through place but by a certain vital intensity. It is present whole and at once through every particle: not smaller in smaller parts, nor larger in larger ones, but more intense in one place and less intense in another; whole in all and whole in each. Only so can it sense as a whole whatever occurs in the body, even when it does not occur in the whole body. For when something is touched at a tiny point in the flesh, although that place is not the whole body—indeed, it scarcely seems to be in the body at all—the whole soul is nevertheless aware of it. What is sensed does not run throughout every part of the body; it is sensed only where it occurs. How, then, does what does not happen in the whole body reach the whole soul at once? Nor does the soul abandon the other parts in order to be whole there, for those parts in which nothing of the kind has happened live by its presence. If both events happened at once, neither would equally escape the whole soul. Thus Aurelius. But perhaps you will say that the soul is extended through the entire body in such a way that one part is in the foot, another in the lower leg, another in the thigh, breast, or neck, and the highest part in the brain, where the principal judgment is made. On this account, you may say, the soul's power seated in the brain judges the pain in the foot not because that same power is also present in the foot, but because, in a kind of succession, one part of the soul reports the foot's affection to another until it reaches the brain. You will surely not deny that these lower parts of the soul sense, since it is plainly evident that an affection is perceived in those members. For if the foot's affection must be reported to the brain, the report occurs either because the intervening members are affected one after another, or because, although they are not affected, they nevertheless sense the pain of the foot and convey it to the brain.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book VII · VII.5.2
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive