DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II

Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IIBook VII · Chapter 2 · § 1

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Latin Page · Branch 122 of 191

Book VII · Chapter 2 · § 1

Latin

p. 238

Secunda ratio. Oportet quinque sensus ad unum centrum conduci.

Visus colores attingit, non voces; auditus voces duntaxat; olfactus odores. Animus colorem, vocem, odorem ita invicem comparat, aut aliud colorem esse quam vocem et alia similiter iudicet. Illa vis per quam ita iudicat animus cognoscit tum colores tum voces et alia quae invicem comparat. Quomodo enim diceret colorem aliud esse quam vocem nisi simul utrumque cognosceret? Quaenam ista vis est? Visusne? Minime. Non enim voces agnoscit. Ita neque auditus, qui colorum ignarus est, neque unus aliquis omnino quinque sensuum. Quisque enim illorum unum quiddam nuntiat solum neque potis est plura invicem comparare. Vis una certe illa est interior animae, ad quam velut centrum a quinque sensuum instrumentis circumpositis undique varia nuntiantur. Illa una omnia illorum quinque sensuum obiecta et operationes diiudicat. Neque dicas duas aut plures esse animae vires internas per quas anima illa comparet. Sint, si vis, geminae vires. Responde igitur: quoties anima colorem ad vocem comparatura est, utrum per utramque vim apprehendat utrumque, colorem scilicet atque vocem, an per alteram alterum? Si utraque vis apprehendit utrumque, quid opus est viribus geminis, cum una sufficiat ad comparationis opus et tantundem faciat una quantum ambae? In necessariis rebus natura non deficit; supervacuis non abundat. Sin per alteram vim alterum tantum noscit, per neutram invicem comparabit utrumque. Tamen per vim aliquam comparat. Est igitur alia quaedam vis praeter geminas illas ante confictas per quam anima plura illa comparat invicem.

238

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VII

p. 239

Second argument. The five senses must be brought together at a single center.

Sight apprehends colors, not voices; hearing, voices alone; smell, odors. The mind compares color, voice, and odor with one another—or, put another way, judges that color is one thing and voice another, and similarly with the rest. The power through which the mind judges in this way knows both the colors and the voices, together with the other things it compares. How could it say that color is one thing and voice another unless it knew both at once? What, then, is this power? Sight? Certainly not, for sight does not recognize voices. Nor is it hearing, which knows nothing of colors, nor any one of the five senses. Each reports only one kind of thing and cannot compare several things with one another. There is assuredly one inward power of the soul, like a center to which the five surrounding instruments of sense report different things from every side. This one power distinguishes all the objects and activities of the five senses. Do not say that there are two or more inward powers of the soul through which it makes this comparison. Grant, if you wish, that there are two. Then answer this: whenever the soul compares a color with a voice, does each power apprehend both objects—the color and the voice—or does one apprehend one and the other apprehend the other? If each power apprehends both, what need is there of two powers, when one is sufficient for the work of comparison and one accomplishes as much as both? Nature does not fail in necessary things, nor does she abound in superfluities. But if each power knows only one object, neither will compare the two with one another. Yet some power does compare them. There is therefore another power, beyond the pair just imagined, through which the soul compares these several things with one another.

239

About This Reading Edition

Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.