DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II

Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IIBook VI · Chapter 12 · §§ 11–12

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Latin Page · Branch 109 of 191

Book VI · Chapter 12 · §§ 11–12

Latin

p. 212

Motum quidem in anima proprie actionem Platonici nominant, quoniam in fonte suo fit, formetque corpus et agitet. In corpore vero motum nominant passionem. Cumque molem corpoream etiam universi oporteat moveri ab alio, concludunt universi corporis motum passionem esse a motu animae universalis tamquam ab actione quadam illatum. Et quemadmodum in quolibet genere imperfecta semper ad perfecta reducunt, ita motum corporis imperfectum ad animae motum tamquam perfectum in ipso motionis genere referunt.

Proinde cum quaeritur quonam motu praecipue anima moveatur, respondent: non corporali, est enim incorporea; non imaginabili, caret enim figura; non cognitivo, ignorat enim se ipsam; sed motu secundum essentiam vitalem. Sicut enim essentiae actus est esse, atque intellectus ipsius actus est intelligere, sic vitae actus est vivere. Non enim adventitiam, sed ex se ipsa possidet vitam; atque, ut illorum verbis utar, anima est vita se generans et producens. Vita vero omnis est motus. Quare si omne vivens movetur, etiam quod per se vivit per se quoque movetur; atque quod vivit semper, movetur et semper, non intellectuali videlicet motu, sed vitali. Quapropter semper movetur et non semper. Nam mens quidem secundum potentiam est, vita vero secundum actum. Denique essentia semper vivit, perpetuumque intrinsecus exercet motum, quoniam essentialis vita semper est mobilis. Vires autem et actus quae tam circa vitam quam circa intellectum contingunt vel intermitti vel aberrare quandoque possunt.

212

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VI

p. 213

The Platonists properly call motion in the soul an action, because it takes place in its own source and both forms and moves the body. Motion in the body, however, they call a passion. And since even the corporeal mass of the universe must be moved by another, they conclude that the motion of the universal body is a passion brought upon it by the motion of the universal soul, as though by an action. Just as in every kind they always refer imperfect things back to perfect ones, so they refer the imperfect motion of body back to the soul's motion as perfect within the very kind of motion.

Accordingly, when the Platonists are asked by what motion the soul is chiefly moved, they answer: not a corporeal motion, for it is incorporeal; not an imaginable motion, for it has no shape; not a cognitive motion, for it does not know itself; but a motion according to its vital essence. Just as the act of essence is to be, and the act of intellect is to understand, so the act of life is to live. For the soul possesses life not as something adventitious but from itself; and, to use their words, the soul is life generating and producing itself. All life, moreover, is motion. Therefore, if every living thing is moved, what lives of itself also moves of itself; and what lives always is always moved—not, to be sure, by an intellectual motion, but by a vital one. Hence the soul is always moved and not always moved. The mind exists in potency, but life in act. In short, the essence always lives and perpetually exercises motion within itself, since essential life is always mobile; yet the powers and acts that attend both life and intellect can sometimes be interrupted or go astray.

213

About This Reading Edition

Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.