Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Page · Branch 135 of 191
Book VII · Chapter 8 · § 1
Latin
p. 264Octava ratio. Complexio agit per vim qualitatum.
Actio complexionis eiusque formae semper per qualitates ex quibus ipsa est conflata peragitur. Ideoque numquam aliquid tam sublime complexio operatur, quin ad illud qualitatum se vires extendant. Caloris opus est penetrare atque dissolvere. Animae autem nutritiva potentia per calorem tamquam instrumentum non dissolvit tantum cibos, quod ipsius caloris est proprium, sed etiam concoquit digeritque et ad formam vivae carnis et figuram humanam perducit; quae quidem actio caloris excedit potentiam. Augmentum quoque animalis a calore provenire non potest tamquam causa principali. Non enim fit nisi per nutrimentum; et cum ad certum terminum magnitudinis perducatur, certamque figuram, calor autem, si detur materia, sine certo termino vel figura se fundat, cumve oporteat terminum figuramque operi a principali agente praescribi, constat principalem augmenti fabrum calorem esse non posse; immo vero neque aliam ullam accidentalem formam id posse facere, si non potest calor, qui est omnium praestantissimus. Fit tamen augmentum ab anima. Ex quo concluditur animam non esse formam accidentalem, quod saepissime nobis est probandum. Concluditur etiam non esse eam ex formis accidentalibus constitutam, quia non posset qualitates quae absque certo termino, gradu, proportione, figura vagantur, ad haec ipsa rationaliter ordinare. Concluditur postremo animam non esse substantialem aliquam formam elementi vel mixti. Talis enim formae motus ad unicum dirigitur terminum, sicut diximus. Augmentum vero in quamlibet partem aeque porrigitur.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VII
p. 265Eighth argument. A bodily constitution acts through the power of its qualities.
Every operation of a bodily constitution and of its form is carried out through the qualities of which that constitution is composed. Thus a constitution never performs anything so lofty that the powers of its qualities do not extend to that result. The work of heat is to penetrate and dissolve. The soul's nutritive power, however, uses heat as an instrument not merely to dissolve food—which is heat's own proper work—but also to cook and digest it and bring it to the form of living flesh and the human figure. This action exceeds the power of heat. Nor can an animal's growth proceed from heat as its principal cause. Growth occurs only through nourishment; and since it is brought to a definite limit of size and a definite figure, whereas heat, given matter, spreads without definite limit or figure, and since the principal agent must prescribe the limit and figure of its work, it is clear that heat cannot be the principal craftsman of growth. Indeed, no other accidental form can do this if heat, the most excellent of them all, cannot. Yet growth is brought about by the soul. From this we conclude that the soul is not an accidental form—a conclusion we must prove repeatedly. We also conclude that it is not constituted from accidental forms, for it could not rationally order qualities that wander without definite limit, degree, proportion, or figure toward those very determinations. Finally, we conclude that the soul is not some substantial form of an element or a mixture. The motion of a form of this kind is directed toward a single limit, as we have said, whereas growth extends equally in every direction.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book VII · VII.8.1
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive