DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II

Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IIBook VI · Chapter 13 · §§ 8–10

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

English Page · Branch 116 of 191

Book VI · Chapter 13 · §§ 8–10

Latin

p. 226

Idem quoque patietur si anima qualitas sit et complexio aliqua humorum atque membrorum. Pariter enim qualitas fluit et humor. Atque in ipsa nutritione anima effluet refluetque sicut corpus; neque constabit animal secundum formam magis quam secundum materiam propriam. Neque servabitur innumeralis unitas animalis, neque continuatio motionis nutrimenti aut augmenti. Neque erit in animali vis aliqua horum motuum ordinatrix, quae ita sibi ipsa constet ut et ordinem ipsis progrediendi et terminum imponat progressioni, quousque nutriri oporteat vel augeri. Necesse est enim rectorem illum in se consistere qui ordinat sistitque mobilia.

Obiciet forte aliquis: ita videmus in corpore nostro figuram eandem diutissime permanere, licet caro labat et refluat. Similiter quid prohibet in anima easdem rerum cognitarum imagines permanere, licet animae substantia ex vetere mutetur in novam? Respondemus: neque eandem prorsus manere figuram, neque penitus similem, sed priorem frequenter abeunte carne abire et in carne recente novam priori quodammodo similem refici. Idque fieri a quodam artifice stabilissimo interius fabricante, qui cum maneat semper idem habeatque in se membrorum familiaris corporis disponendorum rationes et semina, potest novis humoribus quotidie influentibus complexionem similem ac prioribus tradere et recenti carni similem ac veteri praebere figuram.

Non aliter quam vultus qui flumen superne despiciens fluentes undas novasque quolibet momento novis imaginibus sui depingit, ita ut idem in variis undis vultus persistere videatur. Intimus autem ille faber corporis atque stabilis anima est. Quae si et ipsa fluat, certe neque similes corpus prae se diu feret effigies et figuras, neque anima scientias similes retinebit. Quia tunc neque ipsa vi sua eas tenebit, neque aderit illi aliquis qui aut stabiliat illas in animo aut similes prioribus alias generet.

226

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VI

p. 227

The same result will follow if the soul is a quality and a certain temperament of the humors and members. For quality flows away just as humor does. In the very process of nourishment the soul will flow out and flow back in like the body, and the animal will no more remain constant in its form than in its proper matter. Nor will the animal's unity beyond number be preserved, nor the continuity of the motion of nourishment or growth. Nor will there be in the animal any power that orders these motions, remaining so constant in itself that it both establishes the order in which they proceed and sets a limit to their progress—how long the animal ought to be nourished or to grow. The ruler that orders and brings moving things to rest must itself stand firm within itself.

Someone may perhaps object: we see the same figure remain in our body for a very long time, although the flesh ebbs and flows. What, then, similarly prevents the same images of things known from remaining in the soul, although the soul's substance changes from an old one into a new? We answer that not precisely the same figure remains, nor one entirely similar. Rather, as the former flesh repeatedly departs, its figure departs with it, and in the fresh flesh a new figure is fashioned that in some measure resembles the former. This is done by a supremely stable craftsman working within. Because it always remains the same and contains within itself the patterns and seeds for arranging the members of its familiar body, it can give the new humors that flow in each day a temperament like the former one and can give the fresh flesh a figure like the old.

It is just as a face, looking down upon a river from above, paints the flowing waves—new at every moment—with ever new images of itself, so that the same face appears to persist in the changing waters. That inward and stable craftsman of the body is the soul. If the soul itself also flows, the body will certainly not long display similar likenesses and forms, nor will the soul retain similar knowledge. For then the soul will not hold them by its own power, and no one will be present either to establish them firmly in the soul or to generate others like those that came before.

227

About This Reading Edition

Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.