Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II
Books V–VIII · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Page · Branch 112 of 191
Book VI · Chapter 12 · §§ 18–19
Latin
p. 218Hae discursiones motiones quaedam sunt et naturae animi propriae, ut alias declaravimus. Non enim Deo vel angelis congruunt, qui simul omnia possident atque vident. Non corporibus competunt, quae per se nihil agunt. Non formis corporeis, quae ad incorporalia non moventur. Huiusmodi vero discursiones ad divina nos ducentes supra naturam corporis elevant. Efferri vero supra naturam suam neque corpus neque aliud quicquam per se ipsum valet. Igitur revolutiones tales quae sunt a corporibus alienae, animo tamen insunt, testantur animam vel corpus vel formam divisam in corpore esse non posse. Praesertim cum anima secundum illas per se, id est per naturam ac vim propriam, agitetur, ideoque per se moveatur, quod nequit corpus.
Praeterea apparent in anima motionum corporalium exemplaria. Generationis, quando divinis haeret. Corruptionis, quando mortalibus. Augmenti, quando reminiscitur. Decrementi, quando obliviscitur. Alterationis, quando variat vices affectionum. Condensationis, prout subito aliquid intuetur vel sese colligit. Rarefactionis, prout discurrit vel circa multa distrahitur. Progressionis in rectum, cum primum attingit externa. Circuitus autem, cum vel in rebus ipsis effectum resolvit in causam et a causa deducit effectum, vel in se ipsam considerandam reflectitur. Moveri rursus videtur in rectum, quando ad corpus sensumque declinat. In obliquum, quando in se angelumve reflectitur. In circulum, quando in Deum principium finemque suum. Sursum ad universalia. Deorsum ad particularia. Ad dexteram quoque atque sinistram in oppositas videlicet generis differentias. Denique ante et retro, quando ad causas naturales effectusve se vertit.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II: Book VI
p. 219These courses of reasoning are a kind of motion proper to the nature of the soul, as we have explained elsewhere. They do not belong to God or the angels, who possess and see all things at once; nor to bodies, which do nothing of themselves; nor to corporeal forms, which are not moved toward incorporeal things. Yet courses of reasoning of this kind, by leading us to divine things, raise us above the nature of body. Neither body nor anything else can of itself be carried above its own nature. Such revolutions, therefore, although alien to bodies, are nevertheless present in the soul and testify that the soul can be neither a body nor a form divided throughout a body. This is especially so because in these revolutions the soul is moved of itself—that is, by its own nature and power—and therefore moves itself, which body cannot do.
Moreover, exemplars of corporeal motions appear in the soul. There is an exemplar of generation when it cleaves to divine things; of corruption when it cleaves to mortal things; of increase when it recollects; of decrease when it forgets; of alteration when it varies the succession of its affections; of condensation when it suddenly beholds something or gathers itself together; of rarefaction when it ranges abroad or is distracted among many things; and of progression in a straight line when it first reaches external things. There is an exemplar of circular motion when, within things themselves, it resolves an effect into its cause and derives the effect from the cause, or when it turns back to contemplate itself. Again it seems to move in a straight line when it descends toward body and sense; obliquely when it turns back upon itself or toward an angel; in a circle when it turns toward God, its beginning and end; upward toward universals; downward toward particulars; to the right and left toward the opposed differences of a kind; and finally forward and backward when it turns toward natural causes or effects.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume II · Book VI · VI.12.18–VI.12.19
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Volume II continues Ficino’s inquiry into the immortality of the soul through Books V–VIII. Its arguments consider the rational soul’s self-motion, its relation to the body, sensation, and the powers of the mind. The Latin and independent English translation follow the supplied edition’s facing pages and matching comparison units.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is independently established from the Florence 1482 editio princeps (M1482), collated against the Paris 1559 printing (G1559), with the Paris 1641 Opera used only as a late control. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and consequential readings are recorded in the apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independent English translation in the voice established in Volume I, preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purposes, and qualifications. Editorial notes and witness variants accompany their passages as numbered notes. The edition and source statement, contents, and reading guidance are also retained. The source locator register remains available in the downloadable edition.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.
- PDF editionComplete Volume II — PDF
- Word editionComplete Volume II — Word
- public-domain-base-witnessFlorence 1482 editio princeps — Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- collating-witness-cc-by-4.0Paris 1559 printing — Universidad Complutense de Madrid
- late-control-and-ocr-aidParis 1641 Opera printing — Internet Archive