Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Facing Pages · Branch 165 of 174
Book IV · Chapter 1 · §§ 95–96
Latin
p. 332Quapropter apud Orpheum singulis Musis praeest Bacchus aliquis, quo vires illarum divinae cognitionis nectare ebriae designantur. Ideo Musae novem cum Bacchis novem circa unum Apollinem, id est circa splendorem solis invisibilis, debacchantur. Sed haec de nominibus divinorum animorum dicta sufficiant.
Verum hanc omnem disputationem hac ratione breviter concludamus, ut antiquorum more dicamus eos esse penitus deridendos qui partes elementorum impuras, ex quibus animalia constant, vitam et rationem habere fatentur, tota vero puraque elementa negant, quasi pars toto sit melior; et mundum vita carere volunt et sensu, qui tamen vitam dat plantis quae non fiunt ex semine, sensum dat animalibus quae per coitum non gignuntur. Quamobrem tres rationalium animarum gradus colligimus. In primo sit anima mundi una. In secundo XII sphaerarum animae XII. In tertio animae multae quae in sphaeris singulis continentur. Haec omnia quae ad sphaerarum animas pertinent, ex Platonicorum opinione narrata, tunc demum affirmanda, cum Christianorum theologorum concilio diligenter examinata placuerint. Nam et Plato in Epinomide, ubi sub propria persona ipse loquitur, de his sub divisione sic inquit: Impossibile est terram, caelum, stellasque omnes et quae ex his constant moles, nisi anima singulis aut adsit aut insit, tam exquisita ratione annis, mensibus, diebusque circumvolvi nobisque omnibus bona omnia facere.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book IV
p. 333Thus, in Orpheus, a Bacchus presides over each of the Muses, signifying that their powers are drunk with the nectar of divine knowledge. Hence the nine Muses and nine Bacchuses revel around the one Apollo—that is, around the splendor of the invisible sun. But enough has been said about the names of divine souls.
Let us bring this whole discussion briefly to a close by saying, in the manner of the ancients, that those people deserve utter ridicule who admit that the impure parts of the elements, from which living creatures are composed, possess life and reason, yet deny these to the complete and pure elements—as though a part were better than the whole. They would also deprive the world of life and sensation, though it gives life to plants that do not spring from seed and sensation to animals that are not born through mating. We therefore distinguish three ranks of rational souls. In the first stands the one soul of the world; in the second, the twelve souls of the twelve spheres; and in the third, the many souls contained within each sphere. All that has been related here concerning the souls of the spheres according to the opinion of the Platonists should be affirmed only when, after careful examination, it has met with the approval of a council of Christian theologians. For Plato too, speaking in his own person in the *Epinomis*, says of these things by way of classification: It is impossible for the earth, heaven, all the stars, and the bodies composed of them to revolve through years, months, and days in so exquisite an order, and to bestow every good upon us all, unless a soul is either present to or dwelling within each one.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book IV · IV.1.95–IV.1.96
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.