Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
Facing Pages · Branch 974 of 1495
Causes of Religious Melancholy. From the Devil, Through Miracles, Apparitions…
1651 English
651–652for what Province is free from Atheisme, superstition, idolatry, schisme, heresie, impiety, their factours and followers? thence they proceed, and from that same decayed image of God, which is yet remaining in us.
Os homini sublime dedit, cœlumque tueri Jussit,——our own conscience doth dictate so much unto us, we know there is a God, and nature doth inform us; Nulla gens tam barbara (saith Tully) cui non insideat hæc persuasio Deum esse; sed nec Scytha, nec Græcus, nec Persa, nec Hyperboreus dissentiet (as Maximus Tyrius the Platonist ser.1. farther addes) nec continentis nec insularum habitator,
let him dwell where he will, in what coast soever, there is no nation so barbarous that is not perswaded there is a God. It is a wonder to read of that infinite superstition amongst the Indians in this kinde, of their Tenents in America; pro suo quisque libitu varias res venerabantur superstitiosè, plantas, animalia, montes, &c. omne quod amabant aut horrebant (some few places excepted as he grants, that had no God at all.)
So the Heavens declare the glory of God, and the Firmament declareth his handie work, Psalm.19. Every creature will evince it;
Præsentemque refert quælibet herba deum.Nolentes sciunt, fatentur inviti, as the said Tyrius proceeds, will or nill, they must acknowledge it. The Philosophers, Socrates, Plato, Plotinus, Pythagoras, Trismegistus, Seneca, Epictetus, those Magi, Druides, &c. went as far as they could by the light of Nature; multa præclara de natura Dei scripta reliquerunt, writ many things well of the nature of God, but they had but a confused light, a glimpse,
Quale per incertam lunam sub luce malignâ Est iter in sylvis,——as he that walkes by Moonshine in a wood, they groped in the dark; they had a gross knowledge; as he in Euripides, O Deus quicquid es, sive cœlum, sive terra, sive aliud quid, and that of Aristotle, Ens entium miserere mei. And so of the immortality of the Soul, and future happiness.
Immortalitatem animæ (saith Hierom) Pythagoras somniavit, Democritus non credidit, in consolationem damnationis suæ Socrates in carcere disputavit; Indus, Persa, Gothus, &c. Philosophantur.
So some said this, some that, as they conceived themselves, which the Divell perceiving, led them farther out (as Lemnius observes) and made them worship him as their God, with stockes and stones, and torture themselves to their own destruction, as he thought fit himself, inspired his Priests and Ministers with lies and fictions to prosecute the same, which they for their own ends were as willing to undergo, taking advantage of their simplicitie, fear and ignorance.
The Anatomy of Melancholy: Causes of Religious Melancholy. From the Devil, Through Miracles, Apparitions…
p. 974For what province is free from atheism, superstition, idolatry, schism, heresy and impiety, or from their agents and followers? From these things they arise, and from that same impaired image of God that still remains in us.
He gave mankind an uplifted face, and bade us look Towards heaven—
Our own conscience tells us as much: we know that there is a God, and nature teaches us this. “No nation is so barbarous,” says Cicero, “that the conviction that God exists is not implanted in it; neither Scythian, Greek, Persian nor Hyperborean will disagree,” as the Platonist Maximus of Tyre further adds in sermon 1, “nor any inhabitant of the mainland or the islands.”
Let a person live where he will, in whatever region: no nation is so barbarous that it is not persuaded there is a God. It is astonishing to read of the boundless superstition of this kind among the Indians, of their beliefs in America: “Each, according to his own pleasure, superstitiously worshipped various things—plants, animals, mountains and so on—everything they loved or feared” (except, as he admits, a few places that had no god at all).
Thus “the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament declares his handiwork,” Psalm 19. Every created thing will prove it:
And every plant reveals God’s presence.
“Unwillingly they know it; reluctantly they confess it,” as the same Maximus of Tyre continues: willing or unwilling, they must acknowledge it. The philosophers Socrates, Plato, Plotinus, Pythagoras, Trismegistus, Seneca and Epictetus, the Magi, Druids and the rest, went as far as they could by the light of nature. “They left many splendid writings on the nature of God,” wrote many things well about God’s nature; but they had only an indistinct light, a glimpse:
As under a wavering moon, in grudging light, A journey passes through the woods—
Like someone walking by moonlight in a wood, they groped in the dark; their knowledge was crude. As the speaker in Euripides says, “O God, whatever you are, whether heaven, earth or something else”; and that saying attributed to Aristotle, “Being of beings, have mercy on me.” The same was true of the soul’s immortality and happiness in the life to come.
“Pythagoras dreamed of the soul’s immortality,” says Jerome; “Democritus did not believe in it; Socrates discussed it in prison to console himself for his condemnation. Indian, Persian, Goth and the rest philosophize about it.”
So some said one thing, some another, according to their own conceptions. Perceiving this, the Devil led them further astray, as Lemnius observes, and made them worship him as their god through blocks of wood and stones, and torture themselves to their own destruction, just as he pleased. He inspired his priests and ministers with lies and fictions to pursue the same purpose, which they were equally willing to undertake for their own ends, exploiting people’s simplicity, fear and ignorance.
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · Causes of Religious Melancholy. From the Devil, Through Miracles, Apparitions…
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening