Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
Facing Pages · Branch 929 of 1495
The Cure of Jealousy: Avoiding Occasions for It, Keeping Occupied; Good…
1651 English
618–619S. Francis by chance seeing a Frier familiarly kissing another mans wife, was so far from misconceiving it, that he presently kneeled down and thanked God there was so much charity left: but they on the other side will ascribe nothing to naturall causes, indulge nothing to familiarity, mutuall society, freindship: but out of a sinister suspition, presently lock them close, watch them, thinking by those means to prevent all such inconveniences, that’s the way to help it; whereas by such tricks they do aggravate the mischief. ’Tis but in vain to watch that which will away.
Nec custodiri si velit ulla potest; Nec mentem servare potes, licet omnia serves; Omnibus exclusis, intus Adulter erit.None can be kept resisting for her part; Though body be kept close, within her heart Advoury lurks, t’ exclude it ther’s no art.Argus with an hundred eyes cannot keep her, & hunc unus sæpè fefellit amor, as in Ariosto.
If all our hearts were eyes, yet sure they said We husbands of our wives should be betraied.Hierome holds, uxor impudica servari non potest, pudica non debet, infida custos castitatis est necessitas, to what end is all your custody? A dishonew woman cannot be kept, an honest woman ought not to be kept, necessity is a keeper not to be trusted. Difficile custoditur, quod plures amant; That which many covet, can hardly be preserved, as Salisburiensis thinks.
I am of Æneas Sylvius minde, Those jealous Italians do very ill to lock up their wives; for women are of such a disposition, they will most covet that which is denyed most, and offend least when they have free liberty to trespass. It is in vain to lock her up if she be dishonest; & tyrannicum imperium, as our great Mr. Aristotle cals it, too tyrannical a taske, most unfit:
For when she perceives her husband observes her and suspects, liberius peccat, saith Nevisanus. Toxica Zelotypo dedit uxor mæcha marito, she is exasperated, seeks by all means to vindicate her self, and will therefore offend, because she is unjustly suspected. The best course then is to let them have their own wills, give them free liberty, without any keeping.
In vain our friends from this do us dehort, For beauty will be where is most resort.If she be honest as Lucretia to Collatinus, Laudamia to Protesilaus, Penelope to her Ulysses, she will so continue her honour, good name, credit,
Penelope conjux semper Ulyssis ero;And as Phocias wife in Plutarch, called her husband her wealth, treasure, world, joy, delight, orbe and spheare, she will hers. The vow she made unto her good man; love, vertue, religion, zeal, are better keepers then all those locks, Eunuches, prisons; she will not be moved:
The Anatomy of Melancholy: The Cure of Jealousy: Avoiding Occasions for It, Keeping Occupied; Good…
p. 929St Francis happened to see a friar affectionately kissing another man’s wife. Far from misconstruing it, he immediately knelt and thanked God that so much charity remained. But jealous men, on the other hand, will attribute nothing to natural causes and allow nothing to familiar acquaintance, companionship or friendship. Instead, out of a hostile suspicion, they immediately lock women up and watch them, thinking these measures will prevent all such troubles: that is the way to remedy it! Yet by such tricks they make the trouble worse. It is useless to guard what is determined to get away.
No woman can be kept under guard if she wishes otherwise; Nor can you guard her mind, though you guard everything; Shut everyone out: the adulterer will be within.
None can be guarded if she herself resists; Though her body is confined, within her heart Adultery lurks: no skill can shut it out.
Argus with his hundred eyes cannot guard her, “and Love alone has often deceived him,” as in Ariosto.
Even if our hearts were all eyes, they said, We husbands would still surely be betrayed by our wives.
Jerome holds that “an unchaste wife cannot be guarded; a chaste one should not be; compulsion is an untrustworthy guardian of chastity.” What is the point of all your guarding? An unchaste woman cannot be kept under guard; a chaste woman should not be; necessity is a keeper not to be trusted. “What many desire is hard to guard”: what many covet can hardly be preserved, as John of Salisbury thinks.
I agree with Aeneas Sylvius: “Those jealous Italians do very wrong to lock up their wives; for women are so disposed that they most desire what is most denied them, and offend least when they have complete freedom to transgress.” Locking her up is useless if she is unchaste; and it is “tyrannical rule,” as our great master Aristotle calls it—an excessively tyrannical imposition, altogether improper.
For when she realizes that her husband watches and suspects her, “she sins more freely,” says Nevizzano. “The adulterous wife gave poison to her jealous husband.” She is infuriated, tries every means of avenging herself, and will therefore offend because she is unjustly suspected. The best course, then, is to let them do as they wish and give them complete freedom, without any guarding.
Our friends try in vain to dissuade us from this, For beauty will go where the most people gather.
If she is faithful, as Lucretia was to Collatinus, Laodamia to Protesilaus, or Penelope to her Ulysses, she will thus preserve her honour, good name and reputation:
I, Penelope, shall always be Ulysses’s wife.
And just as Phocion’s wife in Plutarch called her husband “her wealth, treasure, world, joy, delight, orb and sphere,” so will she call hers. The vow she made to her husband, love, virtue, religion and devotion are better guardians than all those locks, eunuchs and prisons. She will not be moved:
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · The Cure of Jealousy: Avoiding Occasions for It, Keeping Occupied; Good…
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening