Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
Facing Pages · Branch 239 of 1495
Subsection 6 Excessive Exercise as a Cause, and How It Acts. Solitude And…
1651 English
89–90some Monasteries and Collegiate Cels might have been well spared, and their revenues otherwise imployed, here and there one, in good Towns or Cities at least, for men and women of all sorts & conditions to live in, to sequester themselves from the cares and tumults of the world, that were not desirous, or fit to marry, or otherwise willing to be troubled with common affairs, and know not well where to bestow themselves, to live apart in, for more conveniency, good education, better company sake, to follow their studies (I say) to the perfection of arts and sciences, common good, and as some truly devoted Monks of old had done, freely and truly to serve God.
For these men are neither solitary, nor idle, as the Poet made answer to the husbandman in Æsop, that objected idleness to him; he was never so idle as in his company; or that Scipio Africanus in Tully, Nunquam minus solus, quam cum solus; nunquam minus otiosus, quam quum esset otiosus; never less solitary, then when he was alone, never more busie, then when he seemed to be most idle.
It is reported by Plato in his dialogue de Amore, in that prodigious commendation of Socrates, how a deep meditation coming into Socrates minde by chance, he stood still musing, eodem vestigio cogitabundus, from morning to noon, and when as then he had not yet finished his meditation, perstabat cogitans, he so continued till the evening, the soldiers (for he then followed the Camp) observed him with admiration, and on set purpose watched all night, but he persevered immovable ad exortum solis, till the Sun rose in the morning, and then saluting the Sun, went his wayes.
In what humor constant Socrates did thus, I know not, or how he might be affected, but this would be pernicious to another man; what intricate business might so really possess him, I cannot easily guess; But this is otiosum otium, it is far otherwise with these men, according to * Seneca, Omnia nobis mala solitudo persuadet; this solitude undoeth us, pugnat cum vitâ sociali; ’tis a destructive solitariness.
These men are Devils alone, as the saying is, Homo solus aut Deus, aut Dæmon: a man alone, is either a Saint or a Devil, mens ejus aut languescit, aut tumescit; and Væ soli in this sense, woe be to him that is so alone. These wretches do frequently degenerate from men, and of sociable creatures become beasts, monsters, inhumane, ugly to behold, Misanthropi; they do even loath themselves, and hate the company of men, as so many Timons, Nebuchadnezzars; by too much indulging to these pleasing humors, and through their own default.
So that which Mercurialis consil. 11. sometimes expostulated with his melancholy patient, may be justly applyed to every solitary and idle person in particular. Natura de te videtur conqueri posse, &c. Nature may justly complain of thee, that whereas she gave thee a good wholesome temperature, a sound body, and God hath given thee so divine and excellent a Soul, so many good parts, and profitable gifts, thou hast not only contemned and rejected, but hast corrupted them, polluted them, overthrown their temperature, and perverted those gifts with riot, idleness, solitariness, and many other wayes, thou art a traitour to God and Nature, an enemy to thy self and to the world.
Perditio tua ex te; thou hast lost thy self wilfully, cast away thy self, thou thy self art the efficient cause of thine own misery, by not resisting such vain cogitations, but giving way unto them.
The Anatomy of Melancholy: Subsection 6 Excessive Exercise as a Cause, and How It Acts. Solitude And…
p. 239Some monasteries and collegiate houses might well have been spared, their revenues put to other uses: one here and there, at least in substantial towns or cities, for men and women of every rank and condition to live in, secluded from the world’s cares and turmoil. People who did not wish to marry, or were unsuited to it, or were unwilling to be troubled with ordinary affairs and did not know where to settle, could live apart there for greater convenience, good education and better company; to pursue their studies, I say, advance the arts and sciences, serve the common good and, as some truly devoted monks of old had done, freely and sincerely serve God.
For these people are neither solitary nor idle. As the poet answered the farmer in Aesop who accused him of idleness, he was never so idle as in the farmer’s company. Or as Scipio Africanus said in Cicero: “Never less alone than when alone; never less idle than when at leisure”—never less solitary than when he was alone, never busier than when he seemed most idle.
Plato reports in his dialogue On Love, in that extraordinary tribute to Socrates, how a profound thought happened to enter Socrates’ mind and he stood still pondering, “lost in thought on the very same spot,” from morning until noon. When he had not yet finished his meditation, “he remained standing in thought,” and continued until evening. The soldiers—for he was then on campaign—watched him in amazement and deliberately kept watch all night. He remained motionless “until sunrise,” until the sun rose in the morning; then, saluting the sun, he went on his way.
I do not know in what frame of mind steadfast Socrates acted thus, or what he felt; but this would be harmful to another man. I cannot easily guess what intricate problem could so thoroughly absorb him. But this is “idle leisure”; it is quite otherwise with these people. As Seneca says, “Solitude persuades us to every evil.” This solitude ruins us; “it fights against social life”; it is a destructive solitude.
These people are devils when alone. As the saying goes, “A solitary man is either a god or a demon”: a man alone is either a saint or a devil; “his mind either languishes or swells with pride.” And “woe to the solitary,” in this sense: woe to anyone so alone. These wretches often degenerate from human beings, turning from sociable creatures into beasts, monsters, inhuman and hideous to behold, haters of humankind. They even loathe themselves and hate human company, like so many Timons and Nebuchadnezzars, through indulging these pleasing inclinations too much and through their own fault.
Thus the reproach Mercurialis once addressed to his melancholy patient in consultation 11 may justly be applied to every solitary and idle person individually. “Nature seems entitled to complain of you,” and so on. Nature may justly complain of you: she gave you a good, healthy constitution, a sound body, and God gave you so divine and excellent a soul, so many good abilities and useful gifts; yet you have not only despised and rejected them, but corrupted and polluted them, destroyed their balance and perverted those gifts through dissipation, idleness, solitude and many other ways. You are a traitor to God and nature, an enemy to yourself and the world.
“Your destruction comes from yourself”: you have wilfully lost and cast yourself away. You yourself are the active cause of your own misery, by yielding to such empty thoughts instead of resisting them.
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · Subsection 6 Excessive Exercise as a Cause, and How It Acts. Solitude And…
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening