Action choice and fate

Selection

ἐκλογή; ἐκλέγεσθαι

eklogē; eklegesthai

Eklogē and its verb describe selection.

From the book

Stobaeus, Volume II

John Stobaeus · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordSelection describes practical discrimination among alternatives; within the Stoic account, it can favor natural conditions without granting those conditions the moral status of goods.
  • In StobaeusThings between virtue and vice retain differences relevant to selection and rejection, although the report denies that this value contributes to a happy life as virtue does.
  • In this editionUse selection to retain the distinction from the Greek vocabulary rendered choice; an ordinary preference does not establish that its object belongs among moral goods.
  • A place to readChapter 7 · Excerpt 7 · Passage 3 Read the qualification not with regard to selection and rejection beside the final denial of contribution to happiness; both claims belong to the same sentence.
English renderings
selection; selecting; choosing among alternatives

Meaning

Eklogē and its verb describe selection. In the Stoic account this vocabulary allows a rational preference among indifferents without granting them the moral status of goods.

Use in the book

Things between virtue and vice are indifferent with respect to happiness, but not necessarily with respect to selection and rejection. They can possess selective value or disvalue. Diogenes formulates the end through reasoning well in selecting and rejecting things according to nature; Antipater similarly emphasizes sustained selection rather than an unconditional guarantee of obtaining the preferred object. The later Peripatetic account also uses selection, but grants natural objects a different status. Shared vocabulary does not make the schools’ evaluations identical.

The paragraph resolves an apparent tension created by the word indifferent. It explicitly restricts that description to the former of two senses discussed just before it; it then denies indifference in another respect. Consequently, the same object can lack the ethical contribution assigned to virtue while still warranting discriminating treatment. The paired expressions value for selection and disvalue for rejection describe this second relation. Reading only the first or only the last part would lose the intended combination of practical differentiation and a strict account of happiness.

“but not with regard to selection and rejection” (Chapter 7 · Excerpt 7 · Passage 3).

Places to read

  1. Chapter 7 · Excerpt 7 · Passage 32Indifference does not exclude differences relevant to selection.
  2. Chapter 7 · Excerpt 6a · Passage 22Diogenes connects the end with reasoning well in selection.
  3. Chapter 7 · Excerpt 13 · Passage 92The Peripatetic account derives appropriate actions from selection.

Translation in this edition

“Selection” helps preserve its distinction from αἵρεσις and προαίρεσις, rendered with forms of choice.

ἐκλογὴν

Attested. Chapter 7 · Excerpt 7 · Passage 3; Wachsmuth II, printed p. 79.

κατὰ τοὺς ἀπὸ τῆς αἱρέσεως ταύτης, οὐ μὴν πρὸς ἐκλογὴν καὶ ἀπεκλογήν· δι’ ὃ καὶ τὰ μὲν ἀξίαν ἐκλεκτικὴν ἔχειν, τὰ δ’

Source note

Wachsmuth, volume II, printed pp. 76, 79, 119. The noun and verb are grouped as a lexical family; neither implies success in acquiring the selected object.