From the book
Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum
Heinrich Khunrath · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordSimeon supplies both the voice and the argument of the Conclusion.
- In KhunrathThe opening alteration is decisive.
- In this editionUse “Simeon” and “Nunc dimittis” as distinct lookup terms for the figure and the canticle.
- A reading distinctionThe marginal biblical reference stands on p. 166 although the adapted canticle begins on p. 165.
Meaning
Simeon supplies both the voice and the argument of the Conclusion. The chymist who receives and recognizes Magnesia may speak a transformed version of his canticle; the patriarch's recognition of the child before seeing a miracle then defends knowledge of the true matter before witnessing transmutation. The passage occupies pp. 165–168234 and is explicitly referred to Luke 2:29 in the margin.
Use in the book
The opening alteration is decisive. The servant is permitted to labour in peace upon the Stone rather than to depart in peace. His eyes have seen the medicinal Saviour of the great World, expressly identified as the true symbolic effigy and natural likeness of the Saviour of humanity. The continuation makes the promised light illuminate those who err in physical and hyperphysical, or theosophical, mysteries. The people praised are those who honour the Lord's works in Nature and set aside worldly vanities.
Khunrath then changes from the chymist's prayer to an address to the scoffer. Simeon had seen no miracle, yet knew by the Holy Spirit and biblical Scripture whom he held. The true philosopher similarly knows what he holds by inspiration and teaching, the macrocosmic book, Nature's light and reason. The analogy does not simply substitute revelation for natural inquiry; the chymist's grounds are expressly plural.
The conclusion on p. 168 calls the Stone still in humiliation or emptying-out. Recognition concerns its identity and office under that condition, not a completed display of its effects. This is the answer to the demand that Khunrath must first transmute before speaking certainly. The money-craving world is rebuked for making that single result decisive while disregarding higher theosophical and medicinal uses.
Simeon also gives the Conclusion a posture of grateful commencement. The newly assured practitioner is set to work, and the margin calls for perseverance instead of constantly changing one's opinion about the matter. The canticle is therefore adapted to a beginning whose ground is secure, not presented as a certificate that preparation has ended.
Places to read
- 1599 p. 165The Conclusion rewrites the canticle as permission to laborate in peace
- 1599 p. 166The promised light and people are recast through theosophical understanding of Nature
- 1599 p. 166 · marginLuke 2:29 identifies the scriptural passage
- 1599 p. 167Simeon’s certainty before miracles is compared with recognition before transmutation
- 1599 p. 168The recognized subject is still in humiliation or emptying-out
Translation in this edition
Use “Simeon” and “Nunc dimittis” as distinct lookup terms for the figure and the canticle. Do not translate the altered prayer back into a familiar biblical version: laboriren is the very change on which the application turns. The scriptural cadence is retained while its application is repeatedly revised.
Source note
The marginal biblical reference stands on p. 166 although the adapted canticle begins on p. 165. Citations should not move the reference itself onto the preceding page. The modern apparatus compares Khunrath’s wording with Luther’s version; those detailed verbal comparisons are editorial, while the altered prayer and Luke reference are primary.