DiotimosReading Desk

Argument and disputation

Prepared and Unprepared

præpariret; vnpræpariret; rohen materia; vnpræpariret

Prepared and unprepared describe the state of a matter relative to human work.

From the book

Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum

Heinrich Khunrath · Diotimos Editions · 2026

Browse this book’s lexicon →

Orientation

At a Glance

  • The wordPrepared and unprepared describe the state of a matter relative to human work.
  • In KhunrathPage 44’s untouched natural thing establishes the priority of Nature’s provision.
  • In this editionThe page 98 modern apparatus misapplies the gloss to the catholic matter.
  • A reading distinctionThe claim that an unprepared subject is recognizable should not be confused with proof that it already performs the completed Stone’s effects.

Meaning

Prepared and unprepared describe the state of a matter relative to human work. Neither adjective by itself decides whether the substance is the proper subject. The true starting matter is naturally supplied before the Artist acts, but a prepared version of that same ground is needed for the alleged final powers.

Use in the book

Page 44’s untouched natural thing establishes the priority of Nature’s provision. Page 46 then requires substantial dissolution, cleansing and recomposition. The two statements concern different moments, not a contradiction between refusing and demanding preparation.

On page 98, the exclusion of every silvern or golden addition from the universal route is reinforced by a margin specifying bodily or spiritually prepared, and unprepared. That gloss qualifies the excluded additions; it does not say the catholic matter lies beyond every prepared/unprepared distinction. The body itself begins from purified matter and describes its further preparation.

Pages 158–16023 draw the strongest boundary. Opponents claim a proof of lasting transmutation from still-raw matter. Khunrath answers that regeneration, more-than-perfecting and further qualification must have preceded such a power. The raw subject’s promised potential is not completed efficacy.

At the same time, pages 90–912 allow many prior preparations of silver or gold to stand as possible starting conditions for the special work. Their failure to be universal matter does not make them unusable for every subsequent purpose. The headword consequently requires both a subject and a stage to make sense.

Places to read

  1. 1599 p. 44The initial natural subject has not previously received human artful treatment.
  2. 1599 p. 46The Artist must then prepare that subject through divided works.
  3. 1599 p. 90Silver and gold may enter further discussion in many already prepared states.
  4. 1599 p. 98 · marginPrepared and unprepared qualify the excluded silvern or golden additions.
  5. 1599 p. 159Raw matter lacks the qualifications necessary for lasting transmutation.
  6. 1599 p. 160The operation list reinforces the need for preparation.

Translation in this edition

The page 98 modern apparatus misapplies the gloss to the catholic matter. This entry follows the anchor beside the silvern and golden additions and the syntax of the primary body. “Raw” is a stage-description, not an independent identity for the hidden substance.

Source note

The claim that an unprepared subject is recognizable should not be confused with proof that it already performs the completed Stone’s effects. Khunrath’s defence of recognition before achievement depends on maintaining that difference.