From the book
The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volumes I–II
Joseph Joubert · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordBon sens and sens commun are explicitly distinguished in a sustained comparison and therefore require different English terms.
- In JoubertGood sense can be applied to facts, ideas, politics or the arts.
- In this editionThe English translation reserves good sense for bon sens and common sense for sens commun in the principal comparison.
- A place to beginGood sense is distributed across several objects of application.
- English renderings
- good sense; common sense
Meaning
Bon sens and sens commun are explicitly distinguished in a sustained comparison and therefore require different English terms.
Use in the book
Good sense can be applied to facts, ideas, politics or the arts. Especially when applied to ideas, it exceeds common sense in extent, subtlety and penetration, though not in usefulness. Common sense concerns the needs of life and the soul; literary and intellectual good sense concerns the delights of thought. The latter needs the former to prevent, arrest or correct its deviations, not because common sense actively shares all its work. A separate alternative formulation opposes self-concerned wit to good sense occupied with others. These contexts complicate the assumption that good sense means merely a conventional public opinion.
Places to read
- II, p. 613, entry 4, ¶1Good sense is distributed across several objects of application.
- II, p. 613, entry 4, ¶2Good sense and common sense receive distinct objects and complementary roles.
- I, p. 420, entry 4, ¶1Other-directed good sense contrasts with self-directed wit.
Translation in this edition
The English translation reserves good sense for bon sens and common sense for sens commun in the principal comparison. Spirituel there is intellectual, with a possible association with wit, rather than exclusively devotional. Its abbreviated personal names remain unexpanded.
Source note
Beaunier 1938, I, pp. 420; II, pp. 613.