From the book
Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum
Heinrich Khunrath · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordThe ore catalogue of pages 75–78234 identifies mineral and metallic materials rejected as the pri-material field because they are already embryonated and specified.
- In KhunrathThe sequence names native washing-gold, red-gold and glass-ores, grey silver cobalts, wild silver ores and further mountain kinds.
- In this editionHistorical ore categories are retained rather than silently equated with modern mineral species.
- A reading distinctionThe primary margin at page 76 adds arsenic and orpiment to the same head of argument, broadening the objection without removing its particular focus on specified metallic development.
Meaning
The ore catalogue of pages 75–78234 identifies mineral and metallic materials rejected as the pri-material field because they are already embryonated and specified. The concern is not simply whether a material is immature or comes from a mine. It is whether its generative determination has already begun.
Use in the book
The sequence names native washing-gold, red-gold and glass-ores, grey silver cobalts, wild silver ores and further mountain kinds. It focuses particularly on subtle volatile materials associated with or separated from them. The sentence must not be inverted into a claim that the ores are extracted from those volatile products.
Page 77 gives two grounds for concern: determination towards silver or gold, and possible mixture with foreign mineral or metallic spirits in the mountain. A material’s natural occurrence is therefore no guarantee of either purity or universality. Page 78 adds that even purification into clear water leaves these products as solutions of embryos rather than first matter.
These distinctions make the ore-names independently useful for readers, but none supplies a decoded identity for Magnesia. The body places them downstream of the origin it seeks. Their immaturity distinguishes them from fully ripe metallic fruits, while their specification distinguishes both kinds from the common field.
Places to read
- 1599 p. 75The catalogue begins with volatile materials associated with native washing-gold.
- 1599 p. 76Named ores and mountain kinds are classified as embryonated metals.
- 1599 p. 77Specification and possible admixture provide the two principal objections.
- 1599 p. 78Clear solutions of the embryos remain un-pri-material.
Translation in this edition
Historical ore categories are retained rather than silently equated with modern mineral species. “Wild” belongs to the supplied translation of the source term, not to a claim that the material is untouched catholic first matter.
Source note
The primary margin at page 76 adds arsenic and orpiment to the same head of argument, broadening the objection without removing its particular focus on specified metallic development.