From the book
Intimate Journals
Charles Baudelaire · Diotimos Editions · 2026
Browse this book’s lexicon →Orientation
At a Glance
- The wordIrony is named as a fundamental literary quality, but its work is not confined to saying the opposite of what one means.
- In Intimate JournalsFusées XVII pairs irony with supernaturalism.
- In this edition‘Irony’ is retained as a named quality, but the edition also keeps ‘buffoonery’, ‘playfulness’ and ‘farcical’ where the French changes terms.
- A place to readpuis tournure d’esprit satanique — The literary program gives irony a deliberately disturbing cast.
Meaning
Irony is named as a fundamental literary quality, but its work is not confined to saying the opposite of what one means. It can expose a contradiction in respectable language, let an aphorism undermine itself, or turn the writer's own posture into an object of suspicion. The ‘satanic turn of mind’ places pressure on accepted pieties without guaranteeing that every provocative assertion is secretly harmless.
Buffoonery and playfulness occupy neighbouring ground, though they are not exact synonyms. A pompous manner applied to comic things, or a grotesque image inserted into a solemn claim, can change the reader's distance from what is said. The ethical cost of that distance remains open.
Use in the book
Fusées XVII pairs irony with supernaturalism. One heightens the perceived depth of things; the other can disturb the claims made on behalf of that heightening. The notebook enacts their friction in its sanctified images and abrupt deflations: a halo falls into road mud, God becomes a profitable scandal, and the poet–bourgeois hierarchy is imagined through a stable and a roast body.
Fusées IV's instruction to recount comic things pompously makes manner itself an experiment. Fusées XXII's attack on Hugo's priesthood then inflates and punctures a public literary role. But the conclusion redirects the danger inward: the speaker recognizes the ridiculousness of a prophet in himself and admits that his final pages are anger he wishes to date. Self-implication prevents him from occupying an entirely secure position above the figures he mocks.
Fusées VI warns that the spirit of buffoonery rarely coexists with charity. That warning is essential when reading the collection's cruelty. The existence of irony does not cancel a hostile statement's force, and an interpreter should not label every offensive passage ironic simply to rescue its author. Fusées XVIII's mixture of grotesque and tragic instead identifies a formal pleasure in discordance, one capable of sharpening perception or gratifying a jaded appetite. Irony is thus a literary resource whose use can itself need judgment.
Places to read
- Fusées XVIIpuis tournure d’esprit satanique — The literary program gives irony a deliberately disturbing cast.
- Fusées IVRaconter pompeusement des choses comiques — The mismatch between manner and matter is a practical instruction.
- Fusées VIL’esprit de bouffonnerie peut ne pas exclure la charité, mais c’est rare. — The notebook acknowledges the ethical difficulty of comic distance.
- Fusées XXIIle ridicule d’un prophète — The speaker applies a deflating judgment to his own posture.
Translation in this edition
‘Irony’ is retained as a named quality, but the edition also keeps ‘buffoonery’, ‘playfulness’ and ‘farcical’ where the French changes terms. These are useful distinctions rather than synonyms to standardize away. ‘A satanic turn of mind’ preserves tournure as a disposition or inflection, not necessarily an explicit creed. The grotesque concreteness of ‘roast poet’ and the stable should likewise be read before imposing a decorous abstract paraphrase.