Diotimos Library · Esotericism & Spirituality Collection · Bilingual Edition
The Secret Work of the Hermetic Philosophy
A Fresh English Translation from the Complete 1623 Latin Arcanum
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Introduction · Branch 233 of 244
Contextual Lexicon · Part 1
English
Contextual Lexicon
These entries are new Diotimos commentary. Each begins from the historical usage and then develops a possible philosophical reading. Every quoted sentence is reproduced whole from the present translation. The listed Latin forms occur in its paired source passage; they are not a universal code for other authors. Later interpretations are identified when they are introduced.
Art
Art is the practitioner’s informed participation in a natural process. The author insists that the Stone lies within the powers of nature and art. Elsewhere he describes the philosopher as their servant: skill supplies conditions, separates and joins, and governs an external mover through which an inward power can act. The claim is historical and does not establish the modern success of the promised transformation.
For interpretation, ask what the practitioner supplies and what the matter is said to do. This distinction also gives a philosophical reading discipline: cultivation works through capacities and relations, while force alone does not explain formation.
Passage Canon 13: “Whoever declares the philosophers' secret stone to be beyond the powers of nature and art is utterly blind, for he does not know the sun and moon.”
Source forms: Naturae, artis.
Read in context: canon 13.
See also: Fire, Measure and Proportion, Seed.
Charity
Charity is the declared end of the science. The opening canon gives the term a concrete social range: founding and endowing places of worship and hospitality, aiding a country in danger, freeing captives, and relieving need. The author’s anticipated abundance is therefore judged through what it makes possible for others.
The preface uses the same moral language to explain publication within a guarded tradition. A reader can explore the tension between generosity and concealment without deciding that either cancels the other. The ethical end belongs to the author’s account of the art itself.
Passage Canon 1: “The beginning of this divine science is the fear of the Lord; its end is charity and love of one's neighbour.”
Source forms: charitas, amor proximi.
Read in context: canon 1.
See also: Art, Enigma and Obscurity, Time and the Philosophical Year.
Conjunction
Conjunction is a joining whose generative effect depends on the condition of the partners. The marriage passage insists upon preparation and the removal of what is foreign or superfluous before a stronger offspring can be born. Its imagery explains a relation between prepared principles, rather than merely giving decorative names to a mixture.
The language also invites ethical and philosophical reflection on what makes a union fruitful. Such reflection should remain explicit as interpretation. The text’s terms for purity, seed, soul and offspring continue to carry their historical account of material transformation.
Passage Canon 27: “The end of lawful marriage is the procreation of children.”
Source forms: coniugii, coniuncti.
Read in context: canon 27.
See also: Sun and Moon, Seed, Rebis.
Creation and Chaos
The generation of the Stone is compared with the creation of the world. Confused elements are distinguished, light displaces darkness, waters gather and earth appears. Chaos names an initial lack of order within this comparison; it is not simply an evil principle opposed to all formation.
The analogy makes the small work intelligible through a greater pattern. It can support a reading of transformation as the ordering of capacities, while leaving open the historical author’s claims about the physical subject of the work. Follow the acts of separation and formation before treating the passage as a complete cosmology.
Passage Canon 73: “It must have its own Chaos and its own first matter, in which the elements drift in confusion until they are separated by a fiery spirit.”
Source forms: Chaos, creationis Mundi.
Read in context: canon 73.
See also: Rotation of the Elements, Rebis, Soul, Spirit, and Body.
Digestion
Digestion is the slow conversion of received nourishment into the body’s own constitution. The author compares it with the stomach’s preparation of food and relates it to putrefaction, burial and fixation. The image describes assimilation: what is received must be changed before it can become part of a stable whole.
A philosophical reading can attend to the difference between accumulating material and incorporating it. The historical passage, however, keeps heat, time and the condition of a body in view. Its slowness is a feature of the operation’s mode of action, not a licence to disregard every distinction of stage or measure.
Passage Canon 90: “It thoroughly cooks the nourishment received and converts it into parts homogeneous with the body.”
Source forms: Digestio, nutrimentum.
Read in context: canon 90.
See also: Putrefaction and Burial, Measure and Proportion, Time and the Philosophical Year.
Elixir
The elixir belongs to a further work after the preparation of philosophical sulphur. The author gives it a threefold composition and then distinguishes the qualities it must possess. Tincture, fixation, penetration, fusibility and multiplication are distributed among related contributing principles.
Socrates
Reading The Secret Work of the Hermetic Philosophy · Contextual Lexicon · Contextual Lexicon · Part 1
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
The complete anonymous 1623 Arcanum, conventionally attributed to Jean d’Espagnet, with Latin and a fresh English translation, 138 canons, original marginalia and errata, 88 modern annotations, separately identified historical reception documents, and the complete supplied Diotimos study apparatus.
Historical Text and Translation
Anonymous, Arcanum hermeticæ philosophiæ opus. Paris: Nicolas Buon, 1623. Bibliothèque municipale de Lyon copy, digitised by Google Books, uJNr_M9LDGgC. Conventionally attributed to Jean d’Espagnet; the original title page is anonymous.
About Diotimos Editions
This historical edition credits Diotimos Editions as its English translator.
Rights
Historical texts are public-domain works. The supplied 2026 fresh English translation, Latin reading transcription and Diotimos editorial material are published with the site owner’s authorization. The historical Signifer is credited to the Getty Research Institute copy and Internet Archive.
- Governing historical Latin witnessGoogle Books: governing 1623 witness
- Historical reception diagram witnessInternet Archive: 1650 collection and Signifer
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied PDF edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied EPUB edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied Word edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied Markdown edition