Tap the page, move to the top or bottom edge, swipe down, or press Tab to reveal reading controls. Use the arrow keys or swipe sideways to turn pages.
37.2 · Where is the color?
I.50.37.2 · Wachsmuth pp. 478
“Consider the eyes first in this way, my excellent friend: what you call the color white is not itself a separate thing outside your eyes, nor is it in the eyes. Do not assign it a place; for then it would occupy a position and remain there, and would not be coming into being.”
“But how, then?”1953
37.3 · Color arising in the encounter
I.50.37.3 · Wachsmuth pp. 478
“Let us follow the argument just given, assuming that nothing is one thing by itself. In this way black, white, and any other color will appear to us to have arisen from the eyes’ encounter with the corresponding motion. What we call each color will be neither what strikes nor what is struck, but something that has arisen between them, peculiar to each perceiver.”1954
37.4 · Different perceivers and changing appearances
I.50.37.4 · Wachsmuth pp. 478-479
“Or would you insist that each color appears to a dog or any other animal just as it appears to you?”
“By Zeus, I certainly would not.”
“Well, are you firmly convinced that anything appears the same to another person as to you? Or is it much more the case that it does not appear the same even to you, since you yourself are never in exactly the same condition?”
“The latter seems more likely to me than the former.”1955
37.5 · Qualities and changing relations
I.50.37.5 · Wachsmuth pp. 479
“Then if that against which we measure ourselves, or which we touch, were large or white or hot, it would never have become something different by encountering something else while itself undergoing no change. And if, in turn, the thing measuring itself or doing the touching were any of these, it would not itself become different without undergoing anything merely because something else approached or was affected in some way.”1956
38.1 · Dreams and mistaken perceptions
I.50.38.1 · Wachsmuth pp. 479
In the same work.
“Let us not leave out what remains of the account. There remain dreams, other illnesses, madness, and everything called mishearing, misseeing, or some other mistaken perception. You surely know that all these are generally thought to refute the argument we have just been going through: in such cases our perceptions would above all be false, and it is far from true that the things appearing to each person actually are so. Quite the reverse: none of what appears is so.”1957
38.2 · The challenge to perception as knowledge
I.50.38.2 · Wachsmuth pp. 479
“What you say is entirely true, Socrates.”
“What argument, then, my boy, remains for someone who maintains that perception is knowledge, and that what appears to each person is so for the person to whom it appears?”1958
39.1 · Expertise and the measure
I.50.39.1 · Wachsmuth pp. 480
In the same work.
“We shall then have made a measured case against your teacher: he must admit both that one person is wiser than another and that such a person is a measure, whereas there is no necessity whatever for me, lacking knowledge, to become a measure. . . . .”1959
39.2 · Present experiences are harder to refute
I.50.39.2 · Wachsmuth pp. 480
“In many other ways too, Theodorus, the position could be caught out to this extent: not every belief is invariably true. But concerning each person’s present affection, from which perceptions and the corresponding beliefs arise, it is harder to establish that these are not true.”1960
40 · A conclusion still withheld
I.50.40 · Wachsmuth pp. 480
In the same work.
“Then, Theodorus, we have finished with your companion, and we do not yet concede to him that every person is the measure of all things.”1961
41.1 · True beliefs about perceptible things
I.50.41.1 · Wachsmuth pp. 480
Plato, in the Timaeus.
“Discourse proceeding in the same way, concerning both Difference and Sameness, and borne without voice or sound in that which moves itself, produces firm and true opinions and convictions when it concerns what is perceptible and the circle of Difference, moving correctly, reports throughout its entire soul.”1962
41.2 · Intellect and knowledge
I.50.41.2 · Wachsmuth pp. 480
“But when it concerns what is accessible to reasoning, and the circle of Sameness, turning smoothly, announces these things, intellect and knowledge necessarily result.”1963
41.3 · The soul as their seat
I.50.41.3 · Wachsmuth pp. 480
“Whatever existing thing these two arise in, if anyone ever calls it anything other than soul, he ⟨will say⟩ anything but the truth.”1964